Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kaisa Huhtinen
dblp:303/1896
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-9685-5246ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FUNGI: FUsioN Gene Integration toolset · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
cancer transcriptomics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
deconvolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FUNGI: FUsioN Gene Integration toolset · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor heterogeneity |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum likelihood · 0.5latent statistical framework · 0.5ensemble of fusion detection algorithms · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Network-guided identification of cancer-selective combinatorial therapies in ovarian cancerabstractEach patient's cancer consists of multiple cell subpopulations that are inherently heterogeneous and may develop differing phenotypes such as drug sensitivity or resistance. A personalized treatment regimen should therefore target multiple oncoproteins in the cancer cell populations that are driving the treatment resistance or disease progression in a given patient to provide maximal therapeutic effect, while avoiding severe co-inhibition of non-malignant cells that would lead to toxic side effects. To address the intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity when designing combinatorial treatment regimens for cancer patients, we have implemented a machine learning-based platform to guide identification of safe and effective combinatorial treatments that selectively inhibit cancer-related dysfunctions or resistance mechanisms in individual patients. In this case study, we show how the platform enables prediction of cancer-selective drug combinations for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer using single-cell imaging cytometry drug response assay, combined with genome-wide transcriptomic and genetic profiles. The platform makes use of drug-target interaction networks to prioritize those combinations that warrant further preclinical testing in scarce patient-derived primary cells. During the case study in ovarian cancer patients, we investigated (i) the relative performance of various ensemble learning algorithms for drug response prediction, (ii) the use of matched single-cell RNA-sequencing data to deconvolute cell population-specific transcriptome profiles from bulk RNA-seq data, (iii) and whether multi-patient or patient-specific predictive models lead to better predictive accuracy. The general platform and the comparison results are expected to become useful for future studies that use similar predictive approaches also in other cancer types. Liye He, Daria Bulanova, Jaana Oikkonen, Antti Häkkinen, Kaiyang Zhang, Erdogan Pekcan Erkan, Olli Carpén, Titta Joutsiniemi, Sakari Hietanen, Johanna Hynninen, Kaisa Huhtinen, Sampsa Hautaniemi, Anna Vähärautio, Jing Tang 0002, Krister Wennerberg, Tero Aittokallio |
Briefings Bioinform. | 13 |
| 2021 | FUNGI: FUsioN Gene Integration toolsetabstractMOTIVATION: Fusion genes are both useful cancer biomarkers and important drug targets. Finding relevant fusion genes is challenging due to genomic instability resulting in a high number of passenger events. To reveal and prioritize relevant gene fusion events we have developed FUsionN Gene Identification toolset (FUNGI) that uses an ensemble of fusion detection algorithms with prioritization and visualization modules. RESULTS: We applied FUNGI to an ovarian cancer dataset of 107 tumor samples from 36 patients. Ten out of 11 detected and prioritized fusion genes were validated. Many of detected fusion genes affect the PI3K-AKT pathway with potential role in treatment resistance. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: FUNGI and its documentation are available at https://bitbucket.org/alejandra_cervera/fungi as standalone or from Anduril at https://www.anduril.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Alejandra Cervera, Heidi Rausio, Tiia Kähkönen, Noora Andersson, Gabriele Partel, Ville Rantanen, Giulia Paciello, Elisa Ficarra, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Olli Carpén, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi, Kaisa Huhtinen |
Bioinform. | 14 |
| 2021 | PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samplesabstractMOTIVATION: A major challenge in analyzing cancer patient transcriptomes is that the tumors are inherently heterogeneous and evolving. We analyzed 214 bulk RNA samples of a longitudinal, prospective ovarian cancer cohort and found that the sample composition changes systematically due to chemotherapy and between the anatomical sites, preventing direct comparison of treatment-naive and treated samples. RESULTS: To overcome this, we developed PRISM, a latent statistical framework to simultaneously extract the sample composition and cell-type-specific whole-transcriptome profiles adapted to each individual sample. Our results indicate that the PRISM-derived composition-free transcriptomic profiles and signatures derived from them predict the patient response better than the composite raw bulk data. We validated our findings in independent ovarian cancer and melanoma cohorts, and verified that PRISM accurately estimates the composition and cell-type-specific expression through whole-genome sequencing and RNA in situ hybridization experiments. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: https://bitbucket.org/anthakki/prism. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Antti Häkkinen, Kaiyang Zhang, Amjad Alkodsi, Noora Andersson, Erdogan Pekcan Erkan, Katja Kaipio, Tarja Lamminen, Naziha Mansuri, Kaisa Huhtinen, Anna Vähärautio, Olli Carpén, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi |
Bioinform. | 10 |