Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lena Simine
dblp:303/7959
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 77% Reinforcement learning · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Biological Sequence Design with GFlowNets · ICML 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
biological sequence design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Biological Sequence Design with GFlowNets · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
epistemic uncertainty estimation · 1.1active learning · 1.1GFlowNets · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Biological Sequence Design with GFlowNetsabstractDesign of de novo biological sequences with desired properties, like protein and DNA sequences, often involves an active loop with several rounds of molecule ideation and expensive wet-lab evaluations. These experiments can consist of multiple stages, with increasing levels of precision and cost of evaluation, where candidates are filtered. This makes the diversity of proposed candidates a key consideration in the ideation phase. In this work, we propose an active learning algorithm leveraging epistemic uncertainty estimation and the recently proposed GFlowNets as a generator of diverse candidate solutions, with the objective to obtain a diverse batch of useful (as defined by some utility function, for example, the predicted anti-microbial activity of a peptide) and informative candidates after each round. We also propose a scheme to incorporate existing labeled datasets of candidates, in addition to a reward function, to speed up learning in GFlowNets. We present empirical results on several biological sequence design tasks, and we find that our method generates more diverse and novel batches with high scoring candidates compared to existing approaches. Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio, Alex Hernández-García, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Bonaventure F. P. Dossou, Chanakya Ajit Ekbote, Jie Fu 0001, Michael Kilgour, Dinghuai Zhang, Lena Simine, Yoshua Bengio |
ICML | 11 |