Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lihao Yin
dblp:304/4971
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8237-377XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Efficient and distributed learning · 24% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 14% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 39% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 30% Electronic design automation · 30% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 87% Systems and software security · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DiLA: Enhancing LLM Tool Learning with Differential Logic Layer · KDD (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
satisfiability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DiLA: Enhancing LLM Tool Learning with Differential Logic Layer · KDD (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Certifying Language Model Robustness with Fuzzed Randomized Smoothing: An Efficient Defense Against Backdoor Attacks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Preserving LLM Capabilities through Calibration Data Curation: From Analysis to Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
post-training compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Preserving LLM Capabilities through Calibration Data Curation: From Analysis to Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
randomized smoothing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Certifying Language Model Robustness with Fuzzed Randomized Smoothing: An Efficient Defense Against Backdoor Attacks · ICLR 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack
backdoor defense |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Certifying Language Model Robustness with Fuzzed Randomized Smoothing: An Efficient Defense Against Backdoor Attacks · ICLR 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial robustness
certified robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Certifying Language Model Robustness with Fuzzed Randomized Smoothing: An Efficient Defense Against Backdoor Attacks · ICLR 2025 |
Electronic design automation
design space exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLMShare: Optimizing LLM Inference Serving with Hardware Architecture Exploration · DAC 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › inference serving
LLM serving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLMShare: Optimizing LLM Inference Serving with Hardware Architecture Exploration · DAC 2025 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLMShare: Optimizing LLM Inference Serving with Hardware Architecture Exploration · DAC 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
SAT solver |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | NeuroSelect: Learning to Select Clauses in SAT Solvers · DAC 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Row-clustering of a Point Process-valued Matrix · NeurIPS 2021 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Row-clustering of a Point Process-valued Matrix · NeurIPS 2021 |
Data mining › clustering › model-based clustering
mixture model clustering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Row-clustering of a Point Process-valued Matrix · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network analysis
activation analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Preserving LLM Capabilities through Calibration Data Curation: From Analysis to Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
inference serving |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LLMShare: Optimizing LLM Inference Serving with Hardware Architecture Exploration · DAC 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › SAT solving
conflict-driven clause learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | NeuroSelect: Learning to Select Clauses in SAT Solvers · DAC 2024 |
Data mining › statistical analysis
functional data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Row-clustering of a Point Process-valued Matrix · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
randomized smoothing · 1.7monte carlo tree search · 1.7fuzzing · 1.7functional principal component analysis · 1.0expectation-solution algorithm · 1.0differential logic layer · 1.0LLM prompting · 1.0simulator · 0.9quantization · 0.9pruning · 0.9design space exploration · 0.9calibration data curation · 0.9machine learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DiLA: Enhancing LLM Tool Learning with Differential Logic LayerabstractConsidering the challenges faced by large language models (LLMs) in logical reasoning and planning, prior efforts have sought to augment LLMs with access to external solvers. While progress has been made on simple reasoning problems, solving classical constraint satisfaction problems, such as the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) and graph coloring problem (GCP), remains difficult for off-the-shelf solvers due to their intricate expressions and exponential search spaces. In this paper, we propose a novel differential logic layer-aided language modeling (DiLA) approach, where logical constraints are integrated into the forward and backward passes of a network layer, providing another option for LLM tool learning. In DiLA, LLM aims to transform the language description to logic constraints and identify initial solutions of the highest quality, while the differential logic layer focuses on iteratively refining the LLM-prompted solution. Leveraging the logic layer as a bridge, DiLA enhances the logical reasoning ability of LLMs on a range of reasoning problems encoded by Boolean variables, guaranteeing the efficiency and correctness of the solution process. We evaluate the performance of DiLA on three classic constraint satisfaction problems and empirically demonstrate its consistent outperformance against existing prompt-based and solver-aided approaches. Yu Zhang 0189, Hui-Ling Zhen, Zehua Pei, Yingzhao Lian, Lihao Yin, Mingxuan Yuan, Bei Yu 0001 |
KDD (1) | 5 |
| 2026 | GGBoost: Graph-split gradient boosting trees
Isaac Diaz-Ray, Shuren He, Lihao Yin, Ligang Lu, Huiyan Sang |
Neurocomputing | 3 |
| 2025 | LLMShare: Optimizing LLM Inference Serving with Hardware Architecture ExplorationabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized language tasks but pose significant deployment challenges due to their substantial computational demands during inference. The hardware configurations of existing LLM serving systems do not optimize for the different computational and bandwidth needs of the prefill and decoding phases in LLM inference, leading to inefficient resource use and increased costs. In this paper, we systematically investigate promising hardware configurations for LLM inference serving. We develop a simulator that models the performance and cost across different hardware solutions and introduce a customized design space exploration framework to identify optimal setups efficiently. By aligning hardware capabilities with the specific demands of the prefill and decoding phases, we achieve $13 \%$ cost savings and over $4 \times$ throughput improvements compared to conventional serving system setups. Hongduo Liu, Peng Xu 0052, Lihao Yin, Xianzhi Yu, Hui-Ling Zhen, Mingxuan Yuan, Tsung-Yi Ho, Bei Yu 0001 |
DAC | 4 |
| 2025 | Certifying Language Model Robustness with Fuzzed Randomized Smoothing: An Efficient Defense Against Backdoor AttacksabstractThe widespread deployment of pre-trained language models (PLMs) has exposed them to textual backdoor attacks, particularly those planted during the pre-training stage. These attacks pose significant risks to high-reliability applications, as they can stealthily affect multiple downstream tasks. While certifying robustness against such threats is crucial, existing defenses struggle with the high-dimensional, interdependent nature of textual data and the lack of access to original poisoned pre-training data. To address these challenges, we introduce **F**uzzed **R**andomized **S**moothing (**FRS**), a novel approach for efficiently certifying language model robustness against backdoor attacks. FRS integrates software robustness certification techniques with biphased model parameter smoothing, employing Monte Carlo tree search for proactive fuzzing to identify vulnerable textual segments within the Damerau-Levenshtein space. This allows for targeted and efficient text randomization, while eliminating the need for access to poisoned training data during model smoothing. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that FRS achieves a broader certified robustness radius compared to existing methods. Extensive experiments across various datasets, model configurations, and attack strategies validate FRS's superiority in terms of defense efficiency, accuracy, and robustness. Bowei He, Lihao Yin, Hui-Ling Zhen, Jianping Zhang 0002, Lanqing Hong, Mingxuan Yuan, Chen Ma 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Preserving LLM Capabilities through Calibration Data Curation: From Analysis to OptimizationabstractPost-training compression has been a widely employed approach to scale down large language model (LLM) and facilitate efficient inference. In various proposed compression methods, including pruning and quantization, calibration data plays a vital role by informing the weight importance and activation dynamic ranges. However, how calibration data impacts the LLM capability after compression is less explored. Few of the existing works, though recognizing the significance of this study, only investigate the language modeling or commonsense reasoning performance degradation from limited angles, like the data sources or sample amounts. More systematic research is still needed to examine the impacts on different LLM capabilities in terms of compositional properties and domain correspondence of calibration data. In this work, we aim at bridging this gap and further analyze underlying influencing mechanisms from the activation pattern perspective. Especially, we explore the calibration data's impacts on high-level complex reasoning capabilities, like math problem solving and code generation. Delving into the underlying mechanism, we find that the representativeness and diversity in activation space more fundamentally determine the quality of calibration data. Finally, we propose a calibration data curation framework based on such observations and analysis, enhancing the performance of existing post-training compression methods on preserving critical LLM capabilities. Our code is provided in [Link](https://github.com/BokwaiHo/COLA.git). Bowei He, Lihao Yin, Hui-Ling Zhen, Shuqi Liu 0001, Han Wu 0004, Xiaokun Zhang 0001, Mingxuan Yuan, Chen Ma 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | NeuroSelect: Learning to Select Clauses in SAT SolversabstractModern SAT solvers depend on conflict-driven clause learning to avoid recurring conflicts. Deleting less valuable learned clauses is a crucial component of modern SAT solvers to ensure efficiency. However, a single clause deletion policy cannot guarantee optimal performance on all SAT instances. This paper introduces a new clause deletion metric to diversify existing clause deletion policies. Then, we propose to use machine learning to evaluate and select clause deletion policies adaptively based on the input instance. We show that our method can reduce the runtime of the state-of-the-art SAT solver Kissat by 5.8% on large industry benchmarks. Hongduo Liu, Peng Xu 0052, Yuan Pu 0001, Lihao Yin, Hui-Ling Zhen, Mingxuan Yuan, Tsung-Yi Ho, Bei Yu 0001 |
DAC | 4 |
| 2021 | Row-clustering of a Point Process-valued MatrixabstractStructured point process data harvested from various platforms poses new challenges to the machine learning community. To cluster repeatedly observed marked point processes, we propose a novel mixture model of multi-level marked point processes for identifying potential heterogeneity in the observed data. Specifically, we study a matrix whose entries are marked log-Gaussian Cox processes and cluster rows of such a matrix. An efficient semi-parametric Expectation-Solution (ES) algorithm combined with functional principal component analysis (FPCA) of point processes is proposed for model estimation. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated through simulation studies and real data analyses. Lihao Yin, Ganggang Xu, Huiyan Sang |
NeurIPS | 1 |