VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sander Hummerich
dblp:304/8414
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 91% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Learning Distributions on Manifolds with Free-Form Flows · NeurIPS 2024 Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flows · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
injective flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flows · ICLR 2024 |
Geometric modeling and processing
manifold learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Distributions on Manifolds with Free-Form Flows · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flows · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum likelihood estimation · 2.3riemannian manifold optimization · 1.5bottleneck architecture · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective FlowsabstractNormalizing Flows explicitly maximize a full-dimensional likelihood on the training data. However, real data is typically only supported on a lower-dimensional manifold leading the model to expend significant compute on modeling noise. Injective Flows fix this by jointly learning a manifold and the distribution on it. So far, they have been limited by restrictive architectures and/or high computational cost. We lift both constraints by a new efficient estimator for the maximum likelihood loss, compatible with free-form bottleneck architectures. We further show that naively learning both the data manifold and the distribution on it can lead to divergent solutions, and use this insight to motivate a stable maximum likelihood training objective. We perform extensive experiments on toy, tabular and image data, demonstrating the competitive performance of the resulting model. Peter Sorrenson, Felix Draxler, Armand Rousselot, Sander Hummerich, Lea Zimmermann, Ullrich Köthe |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2024 | Learning Distributions on Manifolds with Free-Form FlowsabstractWe propose Manifold Free-Form Flows (M-FFF), a simple new generative model for data on manifolds. The existing approaches to learning a distribution on arbitrary manifolds are expensive at inference time, since sampling requires solving a differential equation. Our method overcomes this limitation by sampling in a single function evaluation. The key innovation is to optimize a neural network via maximum likelihood on the manifold, possible by adapting the free-form flow framework to Riemannian manifolds. M-FFF is straightforwardly adapted to any manifold with a known projection. It consistently matches or outperforms previous single-step methods specialized to specific manifolds. It is typically two orders of magnitude faster than multi-step methods based on diffusion or flow matching, achieving better likelihoods in several experiments. We provide our code at https://github.com/vislearn/FFF. Peter Sorrenson, Felix Draxler, Armand Rousselot, Sander Hummerich, Ullrich Köthe |
NeurIPS | 4 |