Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raz Segal

dblp:304/8629 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8173-7754ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Software-defined and programmable networks · 28% Internet of things and sensor networks · 28% Network performance modeling · 15%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 54% Cloud and datacenter computing · 46%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
in-network aggregation
1.122022
Constrained In-network Computing with Low Congestion in Datacenter Networks · INFOCOM 2022
SOAR: minimizing network utilization with bounded in-network computing · CoNEXT 2021
Software-defined and programmable networks › programmable data plane
in-network computation
1.122022
Constrained In-network Computing with Low Congestion in Datacenter Networks · INFOCOM 2022
SOAR: minimizing network utilization with bounded in-network computing · CoNEXT 2021
Routing and switching › traffic engineering
congestion minimization
0.612022
Constrained In-network Computing with Low Congestion in Datacenter Networks · INFOCOM 2022
Network performance modeling
network congestion
0.612022
Constrained In-network Computing with Low Congestion in Datacenter Networks · INFOCOM 2022
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.512021
SOAR: minimizing network utilization with bounded in-network computing · CoNEXT 2021
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning
0.212022
Constrained In-network Computing with Low Congestion in Datacenter Networks · INFOCOM 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter network
0.112021
SOAR: minimizing network utilization with bounded in-network computing · CoNEXT 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

combinatorial optimization · 1.1approximation algorithm · 1.1optimization · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 SOAR: Minimizing Network Utilization Cost With Bounded In-Network Computing
abstract
In-network computing via smart networking devices is a recent trend in modern datacenter networks. State-of-the-art switches with near line-rate computing and aggregation capabilities enable acceleration and improved resource utilization for modern applications like large-scale distributed and federated machine learning, as well as big data analytics. We study the problem of activating a limited number of in-network computing devices within a network, aiming at reducing the overall cost incurred by such a deployment. Such limitations on the number of in-network computing elements arise, e.g., in incremental upgrades of network infrastructure, and are also due to requiring specialized middleboxes, or FPGAs, for supporting heterogeneous workloads, and multiple tenants. We present an efficient optimal algorithm for placing such devices in tree networks with arbitrary link rates, and further evaluate its performance in various scenarios and for various tasks, including federated/distributed ML and big data analytics. Our results show that even a small fraction of network devices supporting in-network aggregation leads to a significant reduction in network utilization cost. Furthermore, we show that various intuitive strategies for performing such placements are significantly inferior compared with our solution, for varying workloads, tasks, and link rates.
Raz Segal, Chen Avin, Gabriel Scalosub
IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag.1
2022 Constrained In-network Computing with Low Congestion in Datacenter Networks
abstract
Distributed computing has become a common practice nowadays, where recent focus has been given to the usage of smart networking devices with in-network computing capabilities. State-of-the-art switches with near-line rate computing and aggregation capabilities enable acceleration and improved performance for various modern applications like big data analytics and large-scale distributed and federated machine learning.In this work, we formulate and study the theoretical algorithmic foundations of such approaches, and focus on how to deploy and use constrained in-network computing capabilities within the data center. We focus our attention on reducing the network congestion, i.e., the most congested link in the network, while supporting the given workload(s). We present an efficient optimal algorithm for tree-like network topologies and show that our solution provides as much as an x13 improvement over common alternative approaches. In particular, our results show that having merely a small fraction of network devices that support in-network aggregation can significantly reduce the network congestion, both for single and multiple workloads.
Raz Segal, Chen Avin, Gabriel Scalosub
INFOCOM1
2021 SOAR: minimizing network utilization with bounded in-network computing
abstract
In-network computing via smart networking devices is a recent trend for modern datacenter networks. State-of-the-art switches with near line rate computing and aggregation capabilities are developed to enable, e.g., acceleration and better utilization for modern applications like big data analytics, and large scale distributed and federated machine learning. We formulate and study the problem of activating a limited number of in-network computing devices within a network, aiming at reducing the overall network utilization for a given workload. Such limitations on the number of in-network computing elements per workload arise, e.g., in incremental upgrades of network infrastructure, and are also due to requiring specialized middleboxes, or FPGAs, that should support heterogeneous workloads, and multiple tenants.
Raz Segal, Chen Avin, Gabriel Scalosub
CoNEXT1