Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Avinash Baidya
dblp:304/8639
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 52% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
rule learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | RIMRULE: Improving Tool-Using Language Agents via MDL-Guided Rule Learning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distributional robustness
invariant risk minimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimum description length · 1.0large language model · 1.0linear regression theory · 0.6invariant risk minimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | RIMRULE: Improving Tool-Using Language Agents via MDL-Guided Rule LearningabstractXiang Gao, Yuguang Yao, Qi Zhang, Kaiwen Dong, Avinash Baidya, Ruocheng Guo, Hilaf Hasson, Kamalika Das. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Xiang Gao 0011, Yuguang Yao, Kaiwen Dong, Avinash Baidya, Ruocheng Guo, Hilaf Hasson, Kamalika Das |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2022 | The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk MinimizationabstractMachine learning models often generalize poorly to out-of-distribution (OOD) data as a result of relying on features that are spuriously correlated with the label during training. Recently, the technique of Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) was proposed to learn predictors that only use invariant features by conserving the feature-conditioned label expectation $\mathbb{E}_e[y|f(x)]$ across environments. However, more recent studies have demonstrated that IRM-v1, a practical version of IRM, can fail in various settings. Here, we identify a fundamental flaw of IRM formulation that causes the failure. We then introduce a complementary notion of invariance, MRI, based on conserving the label-conditioned feature expectation $\mathbb{E}_e[f(x)|y]$, which is free of this flaw. Further, we introduce a simplified, practical version of the MRI formulation called MRI-v1. We prove that for general linear problems, MRI-v1 guarantees invariant predictors given sufficient number of environments. We also empirically demonstrate that MRI-v1 strongly out-performs IRM-v1 and consistently achieves near-optimal OOD generalization in image-based nonlinear problems. Dongsung Huh, Avinash Baidya |
NeurIPS | 2 |