Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avinash Baidya

dblp:304/8639 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 52% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
rule learning
1.012026
RIMRULE: Improving Tool-Using Language Agents via MDL-Guided Rule Learning · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning
0.612022
The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distributional robustness
invariant risk minimization
0.612022
The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization
0.612022
The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.612022
The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

minimum description length · 1.0large language model · 1.0linear regression theory · 0.6invariant risk minimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 RIMRULE: Improving Tool-Using Language Agents via MDL-Guided Rule Learning
abstract
Xiang Gao, Yuguang Yao, Qi Zhang, Kaiwen Dong, Avinash Baidya, Ruocheng Guo, Hilaf Hasson, Kamalika Das. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Xiang Gao 0011, Yuguang Yao, Kaiwen Dong, Avinash Baidya, Ruocheng Guo, Hilaf Hasson, Kamalika Das
ACL (1)5
2022 The Missing Invariance Principle found - the Reciprocal Twin of Invariant Risk Minimization
abstract
Machine learning models often generalize poorly to out-of-distribution (OOD) data as a result of relying on features that are spuriously correlated with the label during training. Recently, the technique of Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) was proposed to learn predictors that only use invariant features by conserving the feature-conditioned label expectation $\mathbb{E}_e[y|f(x)]$ across environments. However, more recent studies have demonstrated that IRM-v1, a practical version of IRM, can fail in various settings. Here, we identify a fundamental flaw of IRM formulation that causes the failure. We then introduce a complementary notion of invariance, MRI, based on conserving the label-conditioned feature expectation $\mathbb{E}_e[f(x)|y]$, which is free of this flaw. Further, we introduce a simplified, practical version of the MRI formulation called MRI-v1. We prove that for general linear problems, MRI-v1 guarantees invariant predictors given sufficient number of environments. We also empirically demonstrate that MRI-v1 strongly out-performs IRM-v1 and consistently achieves near-optimal OOD generalization in image-based nonlinear problems.
Dongsung Huh, Avinash Baidya
NeurIPS2