Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sahana Upadhya

dblp:305/0276 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.512021
Intermediate Layers Matter in Momentum Contrastive Self Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › self-supervised contrastive learning
momentum contrastive learning
0.512021
Intermediate Layers Matter in Momentum Contrastive Self Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning
0.512021
Intermediate Layers Matter in Momentum Contrastive Self Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › x-ray imaging
chest x-ray
0.112021
Intermediate Layers Matter in Momentum Contrastive Self Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Medical and health informatics
medical imaging
0.112021
Intermediate Layers Matter in Momentum Contrastive Self Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mean squared error · 1.0cross-correlation · 1.0contrastive loss · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Intermediate Layers Matter in Momentum Contrastive Self Supervised Learning
abstract
We show that bringing intermediate layers' representations of two augmented versions of an image closer together in self-supervised learning helps to improve the momentum contrastive (MoCo) method. To this end, in addition to the contrastive loss, we minimize the mean squared error between the intermediate layer representations or make their cross-correlation matrix closer to an identity matrix. Both loss objectives either outperform standard MoCo, or achieve similar performances on three diverse medical imaging datasets: NIH-Chest Xrays, Breast Cancer Histopathology, and Diabetic Retinopathy. The gains of the improved MoCo are especially large in a low-labeled data regime (e.g. 1% labeled data) with an average gain of 5% across three datasets. We analyze the models trained using our novel approach via feature similarity analysis and layer-wise probing. Our analysis reveals that models trained via our approach have higher feature reuse compared to a standard MoCo and learn informative features earlier in the network. Finally, by comparing the output probability distribution of models fine-tuned on small versus large labeled data, we conclude that our proposed method of pre-training leads to lower Kolmogorov–Smirnov distance, as compared to a standard MoCo. This provides additional evidence that our proposed method learns more informative features in the pre-training phase which could be leveraged in a low-labeled data regime.
Aakash Kaku, Sahana Upadhya, Narges Razavian
NeurIPS2