Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jordan S. K. Hu
dblp:305/1671 · also Jordan Sir Kwang Hu
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
3D vision · 34% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
3d representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Supervised Image-to-Point Distillation via Semantically Tolerant Contrastive Loss · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
3d semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Supervised Image-to-Point Distillation via Semantically Tolerant Contrastive Loss · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
neural network uncertainty |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Estimating Regression Predictive Distributions with Sample Networks · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
predictive distribution |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Estimating Regression Predictive Distributions with Sample Networks · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Estimating Regression Predictive Distributions with Sample Networks · AAAI 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › point cloud object detection
LiDAR-based 3D object detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sinkhorn divergence · 0.7semantically tolerant contrastive loss · 0.7energy score · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7class-agnostic balanced loss · 0.7sparse convolution · 0.6self-attention · 0.6kernel density estimation · 0.6density-aware roi pooling · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Estimating Regression Predictive Distributions with Sample NetworksabstractEstimating the uncertainty in deep neural network predictions is crucial for many real-world applications. A common approach to model uncertainty is to choose a parametric distribution and fit the data to it using maximum likelihood estimation. The chosen parametric form can be a poor fit to the data-generating distribution, resulting in unreliable uncertainty estimates. In this work, we propose SampleNet, a flexible and scalable architecture for modeling uncertainty that avoids specifying a parametric form on the output distribution. SampleNets do so by defining an empirical distribution using samples that are learned with the Energy Score and regularized with the Sinkhorn Divergence. SampleNets are shown to be able to well-fit a wide range of distributions and to outperform baselines on large-scale real-world regression tasks. Ali Harakeh, Jordan S. K. Hu, Naiqing Guan, Steven Lake Waslander, Liam Paull |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Self-Supervised Image-to-Point Distillation via Semantically Tolerant Contrastive LossabstractAn effective framework for learning 3D representations for perception tasks is distilling rich self-supervised image features via contrastive learning. However, image-to-point representation learning for autonomous driving datasets faces two main challenges: 1) the abundance of self-similarity, which results in the contrastive losses pushing away semantically similar point and image regions and thus disturbing the local semantic structure of the learned representations, and 2) severe class imbalance as pretraining gets dominated by over-represented classes. We propose to alleviate the self-similarity problem through a novel semantically tolerant image-to-point contrastive loss that takes into consideration the semantic distance between positive and negative image regions to minimize contrasting semantically similar point and image regions. Additionally, we address class imbalance by designing a class-agnostic balanced loss that approximates the degree of class imbalance through an aggregate sample-to-samples semantic similarity measure. We demonstrate that our semantically-tolerant contrastive loss with class balancing improves state-of-the-art 2D-to-3D representation learning in all evaluation settings on 3D semantic segmentation. Our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art 2D-to-3D representation learning frameworks across a wide range of 2D self-supervised pretrained models. Anas Mahmoud 0002, Jordan S. K. Hu, Tianshu Kuai, Ali Harakeh, Liam Paull, Steven Lake Waslander |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2023 | Dense Voxel Fusion for 3D Object DetectionabstractCamera and LiDAR sensor modalities provide complementary appearance and geometric information useful for detecting 3D objects for autonomous vehicle applications. However, current end-to-end fusion methods are challenging to train and underperform state-of-the-art LiDAR-only detectors. Sequential fusion methods suffer from a limited number of pixel and point correspondences due to point cloud sparsity, or their performance is strictly capped by the detections of one of the modalities. Our proposed solution, Dense Voxel Fusion (DVF) is a sequential fusion method that generates multi-scale dense voxel feature representations, improving expressiveness in low point density regions. To enhance multi-modal learning, we train directly with projected ground truth 3D bounding box labels, avoiding noisy, detector-specific 2D predictions. Both DVF and the multi-modal training approach can be applied to any voxel-based LiDAR backbone. DVF ranks 3rdamong published fusion methods on KITTI’s 3D car detection benchmark without introducing additional trainable parameters, nor requiring stereo images or dense depth labels. In addition, DVF significantly improves 3D vehicle detection performance of voxel-based methods on the Waymo Open Dataset. Anas Mahmoud 0002, Jordan S. K. Hu, Steven Lake Waslander |
WACV | 2 |
| 2022 | Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object DetectionabstractLiDAR has become one of the primary 3D object detection sensors in autonomous driving. However, LiDAR's diverging point pattern with increasing distance results in a non-uniform sampled point cloud ill-suited to discretized volumetric feature extraction. Current methods either rely on voxelized point clouds or use inefficient farthest point sampling to mitigate detrimental effects caused by density variation but largely ignore point density as a feature and its predictable relationship with distance from the LiDAR sensor. Our proposed solution, Point Density-Aware Voxel network (PDV), is an end-to-end two stage LiDAR 3D object detection architecture that is designed to account for these point density variations. PDV efficiently localizes voxel features from the 3D sparse convolution backbone through voxel point centroids. The spatially localized voxel features are then aggregated through a density-aware RoI grid pooling module using kernel density estimation (KDE) and self attention with point density positional encoding. Finally, we exploit LiDAR's point density to distance relationship to refine our final bounding box confidences. PDV outperforms all state-of-the-art methods on the Waymo Open Dataset and achieves competitive results on the KITTI dataset. Jordan S. K. Hu, Tianshu Kuai, Steven Lake Waslander |
CVPR | 1 |