Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lukas Blübaum
dblp:305/7431
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-0230-3995ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 80% Question answering and dialogue systems · 16% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 5% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Knowledge graphs · 59% Machine learning and data management · 41% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › ontology learning
class expression learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Ontolearn - A Framework for Large-scale OWL Class Expression Learning in Python · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
ontology learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Ontolearn - A Framework for Large-scale OWL Class Expression Learning in Python · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal graph |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Causal Question Answering with Reinforcement Learning · WWW 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
causal question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Causal Question Answering with Reinforcement Learning · WWW 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Causal Question Answering with Reinforcement Learning · WWW 2024 |
Machine learning and data management
concept learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | EvoLearner: Learning Description Logics with Evolutionary Algorithms · WWW 2022 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | EvoLearner: Learning Description Logics with Evolutionary Algorithms · WWW 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
graph search |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Causal Question Answering with Reinforcement Learning · WWW 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Causal Question Answering with Reinforcement Learning · WWW 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
description logic |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | EvoLearner: Learning Description Logics with Evolutionary Algorithms · WWW 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neuro-symbolic learning · 1.7large language model · 1.7information gain · 1.1evolutionary algorithm · 1.1biased random walk · 1.1supervised learning · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.8breadth-first search · 0.8actor-critic · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Ontolearn - A Framework for Large-scale OWL Class Expression Learning in PythonabstractIn this paper, we present Ontolearn---a framework for learning OWL class expressions over large knowledge graphs. Ontolearn contains efficient implementations of recent state-of-the-art symbolic and neuro-symbolic class expression learners including EvoLearner and DRILL. A learned OWL class expression can be used to classify instances in the knowledge graph. Furthermore, Ontolearn integrates a verbalization module based on an LLM to translate complex OWL class expressions into natural language sentences. By mapping OWL class expressions into respective SPARQL queries, Ontolearn can be easily used to operate over a remote triplestore. The source code of Ontolearn is available at https://github.com/dice-group/Ontolearn. Caglar Demir, Alkid Baci, N'Dah Jean Kouagou, Leonie Nora Sieger, Stefan Heindorf, Simon Bin, Lukas Blübaum, Alexander Bigerl, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 7 |
| 2024 | Causal Question Answering with Reinforcement LearningabstractCausal questions inquire about causal relationships between different events or phenomena. They are important for a variety of use cases, including virtual assistants and search engines. However, many current approaches to causal question answering cannot provide explanations or evidence for their answers. Hence, in this paper, we aim to answer causal questions with a causality graph, a large-scale dataset of causal relations between noun phrases along with the relations' provenance data. Inspired by recent, successful applications of reinforcement learning to knowledge graph tasks, such as link prediction and fact-checking, we explore the application of reinforcement learning on a causality graph for causal question answering. We introduce an Actor-Critic-based agent which learns to search through the graph to answer causal questions. We bootstrap the agent with a supervised learning procedure to deal with large action spaces and sparse rewards. Our evaluation shows that the agent successfully prunes the search space to answer binary causal questions by visiting less than 30 nodes per question compared to over 3,000 nodes by a naive breadth-first search. Our ablation study indicates that our supervised learning strategy provides a strong foundation upon which our reinforcement learning agent improves. The paths returned by our agent explain the mechanisms by which a cause produces an effect. Moreover, for each edge on a path, our causality graph provides its original source allowing for easy verification of paths. Lukas Blübaum, Stefan Heindorf |
WWW | 1 |
| 2022 | CausalQA: A Benchmark for Causal Question AnsweringabstractAt least 5% of questions submitted to search engines ask about cause-effect relationships in some way. To support the development of tailored approaches that can answer such questions, we construct Webis-CausalQA-22, a benchmark corpus of 1.1 million causal questions with answers. We distinguish different types of causal questions using a novel typology derived from a data-driven, manual analysis of questions from ten large question answering (QA) datasets. Using high-precision lexical rules, we extract causal questions of each type from these datasets to create our corpus. As an initial baseline, the state-of-the-art QA model UnifiedQA achieves a ROUGE-L F1 score of 0.48 on our new benchmark. Alexander Bondarenko 0001, Magdalena Wolska, Stefan Heindorf, Lukas Blübaum, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Benno Stein 0001, Pavel Braslavski 0001, Matthias Hagen, Martin Potthast |
COLING | 4 |
| 2022 | EvoLearner: Learning Description Logics with Evolutionary AlgorithmsabstractClassifying nodes in knowledge graphs is an important task, e.g., for predicting missing types of entities, predicting which molecules cause cancer, or predicting which drugs are promising treatment candidates. While black-box models often achieve high predictive performance, they are only post-hoc and locally explainable and do not allow the learned model to be easily enriched with domain knowledge. Towards this end, learning description logic concepts from positive and negative examples has been proposed. However, learning such concepts often takes a long time and state-of-the-art approaches provide limited support for literal data values, although they are crucial for many applications. In this paper, we propose EvoLearner—an evolutionary approach to learn concepts in , which is the attributive language with complement () paired with qualified cardinality restrictions () and data properties (). We contribute a novel initialization method for the initial population: starting from positive examples, we perform biased random walks and translate them to description logic concepts. Moreover, we improve support for data properties by maximizing information gain when deciding where to split the data. We show that our approach significantly outperforms the state of the art on the benchmarking framework SML-Bench for structured machine learning. Our ablation study confirms that this is due to our novel initialization method and support for data properties. Stefan Heindorf, Lukas Blübaum, Nick Düsterhus, Till Werner, Varun Nandkumar Golani, Caglar Demir, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo |
WWW | 2 |