Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Parsa Farinneya

dblp:305/9727 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2745-7505ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 50% Information retrieval · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
adaptive inference
0.912025
Balcony: A Lightweight Approach to Dynamic Inference of Generative Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
early exit
0.912025
Balcony: A Lightweight Approach to Dynamic Inference of Generative Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.912025
Balcony: A Lightweight Approach to Dynamic Inference of Generative Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Recommender systems
explainable recommendation
0.712023
Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval · SIGIR 2023
Recommender systems
preference-based recommendation
0.712023
Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark
0.712023
Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › evaluation
test collection
0.712023
Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval · SIGIR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

early exit · 0.9dynamic inference · 0.9sparse retrieval · 0.7large language model · 0.7few-shot learning · 0.7dense retrieval · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Balcony: A Lightweight Approach to Dynamic Inference of Generative Language Models
abstract
Benyamin Jamialahmadi, Parsa Kavehzadeh, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Parsa Farinneya, Hossein Rajabzadeh, Aref Jafari, Boxing Chen, Marzieh S. Tahaei. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Benyamin Jamialahmadi 0001, Parsa Kavehzadeh, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Parsa Farinneya, Hossein Rajabzadeh, Aref Jafari, Boxing Chen, Marzieh S. Tahaei
EMNLP4
2023 Self-supervised Contrastive BERT Fine-tuning for Fusion-Based Reviewed-Item Retrieval
Mohammad Mahdi Abdollah Pour, Parsa Farinneya, Armin Toroghi, Anton Korikov, Ali Pesaranghader, Touqir Sajed, Manasa Bharadwaj, Borislav Mavrin, Scott Sanner
ECIR (1)2
2023 Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval
abstract
The rise of interactive recommendation assistants has led to a novel domain of natural language (NL) recommendation that would benefit from improved multi-aspect reasoning to retrieve relevant items based on NL statements of preference. Such preference statements often involve multiple aspects, e.g., "I would like meat lasagna but I'm watching my weight". Unfortunately, progress in this domain is slowed by the lack of annotated data. To address this gap, we curate a novel dataset which captures logical reasoning over multi-aspect, NL preference-based queries and a set of multiple-choice, multi-aspect item descriptions. We focus on the recipe domain in which multi-aspect preferences are often encountered due to the complexity of the human diet. The goal of publishing our dataset is to provide a benchmark for joint progress in three key areas: 1) structured, multi-aspect NL reasoning with a variety of properties (e.g., level of specificity, presence of negation, and the need for commonsense, analogical, and/or temporal inference), 2) the ability of recommender systems to respond to NL preference utterances, and 3) explainable NL recommendation facilitated by aspect extraction and reasoning. We perform experiments using a variety of methods (sparse and dense retrieval, zero- and few-shot reasoning with large language models) in two settings: a monolithic setting which uses the full query and an aspect-based setting which isolates individual query aspects and aggregates the results. GPT-3 results in much stronger performance than other methods with 73% zero-shot accuracy and 83% few-shot accuracy in the monolithic setting. Aspect-based GPT-3, which facilitates structured explanations, also shows promise with 68% zero-shot accuracy. These results establish baselines for future research into explainable recommendations via multi-aspect preference-based NL reasoning.
Haochen Zhang 0001, Anton Korikov, Parsa Farinneya, Mohammad Mahdi Abdollah Pour, Manasa Bharadwaj, Ali Pesaranghader, Xi Yu Huang, Yi Xin Lok, Nathan Jones, Scott Sanner
SIGIR3