Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Parsa Farinneya
dblp:305/9727
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2745-7505ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 50% Information retrieval · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
adaptive inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Balcony: A Lightweight Approach to Dynamic Inference of Generative Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
early exit |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Balcony: A Lightweight Approach to Dynamic Inference of Generative Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Balcony: A Lightweight Approach to Dynamic Inference of Generative Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Recommender systems
explainable recommendation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval · SIGIR 2023 |
Recommender systems
preference-based recommendation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
test collection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language Retrieval · SIGIR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
early exit · 0.9dynamic inference · 0.9sparse retrieval · 0.7large language model · 0.7few-shot learning · 0.7dense retrieval · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Balcony: A Lightweight Approach to Dynamic Inference of Generative Language ModelsabstractBenyamin Jamialahmadi, Parsa Kavehzadeh, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Parsa Farinneya, Hossein Rajabzadeh, Aref Jafari, Boxing Chen, Marzieh S. Tahaei. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Benyamin Jamialahmadi 0001, Parsa Kavehzadeh, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Parsa Farinneya, Hossein Rajabzadeh, Aref Jafari, Boxing Chen, Marzieh S. Tahaei |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2023 | Self-supervised Contrastive BERT Fine-tuning for Fusion-Based Reviewed-Item Retrieval
Mohammad Mahdi Abdollah Pour, Parsa Farinneya, Armin Toroghi, Anton Korikov, Ali Pesaranghader, Touqir Sajed, Manasa Bharadwaj, Borislav Mavrin, Scott Sanner |
ECIR (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Recipe-MPR: A Test Collection for Evaluating Multi-aspect Preference-based Natural Language RetrievalabstractThe rise of interactive recommendation assistants has led to a novel domain of natural language (NL) recommendation that would benefit from improved multi-aspect reasoning to retrieve relevant items based on NL statements of preference. Such preference statements often involve multiple aspects, e.g., "I would like meat lasagna but I'm watching my weight". Unfortunately, progress in this domain is slowed by the lack of annotated data. To address this gap, we curate a novel dataset which captures logical reasoning over multi-aspect, NL preference-based queries and a set of multiple-choice, multi-aspect item descriptions. We focus on the recipe domain in which multi-aspect preferences are often encountered due to the complexity of the human diet. The goal of publishing our dataset is to provide a benchmark for joint progress in three key areas: 1) structured, multi-aspect NL reasoning with a variety of properties (e.g., level of specificity, presence of negation, and the need for commonsense, analogical, and/or temporal inference), 2) the ability of recommender systems to respond to NL preference utterances, and 3) explainable NL recommendation facilitated by aspect extraction and reasoning. We perform experiments using a variety of methods (sparse and dense retrieval, zero- and few-shot reasoning with large language models) in two settings: a monolithic setting which uses the full query and an aspect-based setting which isolates individual query aspects and aggregates the results. GPT-3 results in much stronger performance than other methods with 73% zero-shot accuracy and 83% few-shot accuracy in the monolithic setting. Aspect-based GPT-3, which facilitates structured explanations, also shows promise with 68% zero-shot accuracy. These results establish baselines for future research into explainable recommendations via multi-aspect preference-based NL reasoning. Haochen Zhang 0001, Anton Korikov, Parsa Farinneya, Mohammad Mahdi Abdollah Pour, Manasa Bharadwaj, Ali Pesaranghader, Xi Yu Huang, Yi Xin Lok, Nathan Jones, Scott Sanner |
SIGIR | 3 |