Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julie Kallini
dblp:305/9843
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0835-6485ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 86% Representation and self-supervised learning · 8% Efficient and distributed learning · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
byte-level language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MrT5: Dynamic Token Merging for Efficient Byte-level Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mission: Impossible Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
linguistic generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mission: Impossible Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding
cross-lingual representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Phonemes to the Rescue: Multilingual Tokenization Based on International Phonetic Alphabet · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › token compression
token merging |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MrT5: Dynamic Token Merging for Efficient Byte-level Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subword tokenization · 1.0international phonetic alphabet representation · 1.0token deletion · 0.9dynamic sequence compression · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Phonemes to the Rescue: Multilingual Tokenization Based on International Phonetic AlphabetabstractMultilingual language models often exhibit performance disparities across languages that can arise as early as the tokenization stage.Widelyused subword tokenization approaches favor high-resource languages, and tokenizer-free methods still yield longer sequences for scripts with a higher bytes-per-character ratio.To address these shortcomings, we propose to use the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as a language-agnostic input representation for multilingual tokenizers.IPA provides a compact symbol inventory, greater cross-lingual character overlap, and a more balanced byte-percharacter distribution across languages.We train matched pairs of text vs. IPA subword tokenizers across 24 languages and 14 scripts and demonstrate that IPA tokenizers consistently improve tokenization quality, especially for non-Latin scripts, and generalize more effectively to unseen languages and scripts.Github github.com/Mikki99/ipa-tokenization Milan Miletic, Julie Kallini, Ekaterina Shutova |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | MrT5: Dynamic Token Merging for Efficient Byte-level Language ModelsabstractModels that rely on subword tokenization have significant drawbacks, such as sensitivity to character-level noise like spelling errors and inconsistent compression rates across different languages and scripts. While character- or byte-level models like ByT5 attempt to address these concerns, they have not gained widespread adoption—processing raw byte streams without tokenization results in significantly longer sequence lengths, making training and inference inefficient. This work introduces MrT5 (MergeT5), a more efficient variant of ByT5 that integrates a token deletion mechanism in its encoder to dynamically shorten the input sequence length. After processing through a fixed number of encoder layers, a learned delete gate determines which tokens are to be removed and which are to be retained for subsequent layers. MrT5 effectively "merges" critical information from deleted tokens into a more compact sequence, leveraging contextual information from the remaining tokens. In continued pre-training experiments, we find that MrT5 can achieve significant gains in inference runtime with minimal effect on performance, as measured by bits-per-byte. Additionally, with multilingual training, MrT5 adapts to the orthographic characteristics of each language, learning language-specific compression rates. Furthermore, MrT5 shows comparable accuracy to ByT5 on downstream evaluations such as XNLI, TyDi QA, and character-level tasks while reducing sequence lengths by up to 75%. Our approach presents a solution to the practical limitations of existing byte-level models. Julie Kallini, Shikhar Murty, Christopher D. Manning, Christopher Potts, Róbert Csordás |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Mission: Impossible Language ModelsabstractJulie Kallini, Isabel Papadimitriou, Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald, Christopher Potts. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Julie Kallini, Isabel Papadimitriou, Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald, Christopher Potts |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | What to Make of make? Sense Distinctions for Light VerbsabstractVerbs like make, have and get present challenges for applications requiring automatic word sense discrimination.These verbs are both highly frequent and polysemous, with semantically "full" readings, as in make dinner, and "light" readings, as in make a request.Lexical resources like WordNet encode dozens of senses, making discrimination difficult and inviting proposals for reducing the number of entries or grouping them into coarser-grained supersenses.We propose a data-driven, linguistically-based approach to establishing a motivated sense inventory, focusing on make to establish a proof of concept. Julie Kallini, Christiane Fellbaum |
GWC | 1 |