Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shengxiang Sun
dblp:306/7091
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1592-3751ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 44% Time series and sequential data · 44% Motion planning and robot control · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
failure detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › embodied foundation models
vision-language-action model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › robot policy learning
generalist robot policy |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conformal prediction · 0.9VLA internal feature learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action ModelsabstractWhile vision-language-action models (VLAs) have shown promising robotic behaviors across a diverse set of manipulation tasks, they achieve limited success rates when deployed on novel tasks out of the box. To allow these policies to safely interact with their environments, we need a failure detector that gives a timely alert such that the robot can stop, backtrack, or ask for help. However, existing failure detectors are trained and tested only on one or a few specific tasks, while generalist VLAs require the detector to generalize and detect failures also in unseen tasks and novel environments. In this paper, we introduce the multitask failure detection problem and propose SAFE, a failure detector for generalist robot policies such as VLAs. We analyze the VLA feature space and find that VLAs have sufficient high-level knowledge about task success and failure, which is generic across different tasks. Based on this insight, we design SAFE to learn from VLA internal features and predict a single scalar indicating the likelihood of task failure. SAFE is trained on both successful and failed rollouts and is evaluated on unseen tasks. SAFE is compatible with different policy architectures. We test it on OpenVLA, $\pi_0$, and $\pi_0$-FAST in both simulated and real-world environments extensively. We compare SAFE with diverse baselines and show that SAFE achieves state-of-the-art failure detection performance and the best trade-off between accuracy and detection time using conformal prediction. More qualitative results and code can be found at the project webpage: https://vla-safe.github.io/ Qiao Gu, Yuanliang Ju, Shengxiang Sun, Igor Gilitschenski, Haruki Nishimura, Masha Itkina, Florian Shkurti |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Multi-target HSIC-Lasso via exploiting target correlations
Dubo He, Shengxiang Sun |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2024 | Multi-target feature selection with subspace learning and manifold regularization
Dubo He, Shengxiang Sun |
Neurocomputing | 2 |