Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raphael Leiteritz
dblp:306/8417
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8070-2384ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
u-net · 0.6physics-informed neural networks · 0.6gradient-based inverse method · 0.6fourier neural operator · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine LearningabstractMachine learning-based modeling of physical systems has experienced increased interest in recent years. Despite some impressive progress, there is still a lack of benchmarks for Scientific ML that are easy to use but still challenging and repre- sentative of a wide range of problems. We introduce PDEBENCH, a benchmark suite of time-dependent simulation tasks based on Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). PDEBENCH comprises both code and data to benchmark the performance of novel machine learning models against both classical numerical simulations and machine learning baselines. Our proposed set of benchmark problems con- tribute the following unique features: (1) A much wider range of PDEs compared to existing benchmarks, ranging from relatively common examples to more real- istic and difficult problems; (2) much larger ready-to-use datasets compared to prior work, comprising multiple simulation runs across a larger number of ini- tial and boundary conditions and PDE parameters; (3) more extensible source codes with user-friendly APIs for data generation and baseline results with popular machine learning models (FNO, U-Net, PINN, Gradient-Based Inverse Method). PDEBENCH allows researchers to extend the benchmark freely for their own pur- poses using a standardized API and to compare the performance of new models to existing baseline methods. We also propose new evaluation metrics with the aim to provide a more holistic understanding of learning methods in the context of Scientific ML. With those metrics we identify tasks which are challenging for recent ML methods and propose these tasks as future challenges for the community. The code is available at https://github.com/pdebench/PDEBench. Makoto Takamoto, Timothy Praditia, Raphael Leiteritz, Daniel MacKinlay, Francesco Alesiani, Dirk Pflüger, Mathias Niepert |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Learning Free-Surface Flow with Physics-Informed Neural NetworksabstractThe interface between data-driven learning methods and classical simulation poses an interesting field offering a multitude of new applications. In this work, we build on the notion of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and employ them in the area of shallow-water equation (SWE) models. These models play an important role in modeling and simulating free-surface flow scenarios such as in flood-wave propagation or tsunami waves. Different formulations of the PINN residual are compared to each other and multiple optimizations are being evaluated to speed up the convergence rate. We test these with different 1-D and 2-D experiments and finally demonstrate that regarding a SWE scenario with varying bathymetry, the method is able to produce competitive results in comparison to the direct numerical simulation with a total relative L2error of 8.9e−3. Raphael Leiteritz, Marcel Hurler, Dirk Pflüger |
ICMLA | 1 |