Effective classroom teaching requires instructors to be responsive to their students, such as by pivoting their lectures in real-time to address common misconceptions that their students may have developed. Classroom response systems such as multiple-choice "clicker" systems are one method by which instructors can gauge their students’ understanding during classroom lectures, but open-ended questions that prompt students to engage in self-explanation are better suited to promoting critical thinking. Additionally, analyzing students’ natural language responses typically requires time-consuming manual analysis, which makes it challenging to implement in a classroom setting. To address this challenge, we present an LLM-driven method for automatically assessing students' responses and generating an aggregated summary of LLM-based evaluations for their self-explanations during undergraduate classroom lectures. Our approach extracts relevant knowledge components for a given question, tags students’ responses according to whether they correctly address each knowledge component, and generates class-level summaries that highlight common misconceptions and gaps in knowledge to support instructors in pivoting their lectures in real time. We evaluate the system’s effectiveness at these tagging and summarization tasks on data from an undergraduate computer science course, using quantitative and qualitative metrics such as relevance, sufficiency, hallucination rate, and alignment with instructional goals and desired feedback format gathered through instructor interviews. Results suggest that the explanation-based classroom response system can accurately analyze students’ natural language explanations.

Fostering engagement among undergraduate computer science students in large-lecture settings can be challenging for instructors. Didactic teaching styles common in such lectures may not be as effective as dialogic teaching, but the overhead involved with dialogic teaching may preclude its use in large introductory computer science courses. Classroom response systems such as multiple-choice ''clicker'' systems provide a way for students to engage with an instructor, but evidence suggests that multiple-choice questions may not foster deep thought in the way that open-ended questions do. Open-ended questions foster deeper engagement and AI-enabled learning analytics offer a powerful method of automatically assessing student responses, but grading text responses produced by students and summarizing class-wide performance during lectures presents unique difficulties, especially for algorithmic questions prevalent in computer science lectures.

For more than a decade, a handful of theoretical models have shaped a substantial amount of the research related to students’ emotional experiences during learning. This research has been productive, but articulating the underlying implicit assumptions in existing theories and their implications in our empirical interpretations can help to better investigate the reciprocal relationships between learning and emotion, and subsequently, to develop better interventions. This paper expands upon the existing theoretical frameworks, increasing the types of questions we ask about affect dynamics. We do so within the context of Crystal Island, a virtual world that allows middle school students to investigate microbiology questions. Specifically, we use this data to examine and revise the assumptions that are implicit in these models and the methods we use to investigate them.

Student affect is widely recognized as a major influence on learning gains and engagement, which has led to the development of many automated affect detectors. However, in order to respond effectively to student affect, we must know how students interpret it. This study proposes a novel automated detector that models when students attribute their epistemic emotion to task difficulty. The goal is to use detectors like this one to better understand how to respond to students' affective states (in this case, boredom, confusion, frustration and nervousness). We then discuss the implications of this novel detector for real-time support in game-based learning environments.

Many university computing and engineering departments rely on transfer student enrollment from community colleges, but these students often face unique barriers to academic and social integration. These challenges can be compounded for students from underrepresented racial backgrounds. Using institutional and survey data, correlations among social and academic factors were calculated to measure the impact of a Post Transfer Pathways program on GPA and persistence. While findings indicate that participation has significant positive impacts, URM students may be more vulnerable to disruptions in social and academic factors than non-URM students.