Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amir-Reza Asadi
dblp:309/2543
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3436-3307ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Information theory · 70% Computational complexity · 30% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 21% Reinforcement learning · 12% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory
hypothesis testing |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · COLT 2023 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
1.5 | 3 | 2024 | An Entropy-Based Model for Hierarchical Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Chaining Meets Chain Rule: Multilevel Entropic Regularization and Training of Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
0.9 | 2 | 2025 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · COLT 2023 Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Information theory › hypothesis testing
binary hypothesis testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Information theory
communication constraints |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
hierarchical learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Entropy-Based Model for Hierarchical Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
uniform convergence |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Entropy-Based Model for Hierarchical Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
hypothesis testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
entropy regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Chaining Meets Chain Rule: Multilevel Entropic Regularization and Training of Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Information theory › information measures
mutual information |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › VC theory
VC dimension |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimax analysis · 3.1instance-optimal algorithms · 1.7total variation distance · 1.3hellinger divergence · 1.3multiscale analysis · 0.8entropy-based regularization · 0.8mutual information method · 0.7dudley's inequality · 0.7chaining · 0.7multilevel relative entropy · 0.4metropolis algorithm · 0.4gibbs posterior · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing Under Local Differential Privacy and Communication ConstraintsabstractWe study simple binary hypothesis testing under both local differential privacy (LDP) and communication constraints. We qualify our results as either minimax optimal or instance optimal: the former hold for the set of distribution pairs with prescribed Hellinger divergence and total variation distance, whereas the latter hold for specific distribution pairs. For the sample complexity of simple hypothesis testing under pure LDP constraints, we establish instance-optimal bounds for distributions with binary support; minimax-optimal bounds for general distributions; and (approximately) instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms for general distributions. When both privacy and communication constraints are present, we develop instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms that achieve the minimum possible sample complexity (up to universal constants). Our results on instance-optimal algorithms hinge on identifying the extreme points of the joint range set$\mathcal {A}$of two distributionspandq, defined as$\mathcal {A}:= \{(\vec {T} p, \vec {T} q) | \vec {T}\in \mathcal {C}\}$, where$\mathcal {C}$is the set of channels characterizing the constraints. Ankit Pensia, Amir-Reza Asadi, Varun S. Jog, Po-Ling Loh |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2024 | An Entropy-Based Model for Hierarchical LearningabstractMachine learning, the predominant approach in the field of artificial intelligence, enables computers to learn from data and experience. In the supervised learning framework, accurate and efficient learning of dependencies between data instances and their corresponding labels requires auxiliary information about the data distribution and the target function. This central concept aligns with the notion of regularization in statistical learning theory. Real-world datasets are often characterized by multiscale data instance distributions and well-behaved, smooth target functions. Scale-invariant probability distributions, such as power-law distributions, provide notable examples of multiscale data instance distributions in various contexts. This paper introduces a hierarchical learning model that leverages such a multiscale data structure with a multiscale entropy-based training procedure and explores its statistical and computational advantages. The hierarchical learning model is inspired by the logical progression in human learning from easy to complex tasks and features interpretable levels. In this model, the logarithm of any data instance’s norm can be construed as the data instance's complexity, and the allocation of computational resources is tailored to this complexity, resulting in benefits such as increased inference speed. Furthermore, our multiscale analysis of the statistical risk yields stronger guarantees compared to conventional uniform convergence bounds. Amir-Reza Asadi |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2023 | Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication ConstraintsabstractWe study simple binary hypothesis testing under local differential privacy (LDP) and communication constraints. Our results are either minimax optimal or instance optimal: the former hold for the set of distribution pairs with prescribed Hellinger divergence and total variation distance, whereas the latter hold for specific distribution pairs. For the sample complexity of simple hypothesis testing under pure LDP constraints, we establish instance-optimal bounds for distributions with binary support; minimax-optimal bounds for general distributions; and (approximately) instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms for general distributions. Under both privacy and communication constraints, we develop instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms that achieve minimal sample complexity (up to universal constants). Our results on instance-optimal algorithms hinge on identifying the extreme points of the joint range set of two distributions $p$ and $q$, defined as $\mathcal{A} := \{(\mathbf{T} p, \mathbf{T} q) | \mathbf{T} \in \mathcal{C}\}$, where $\mathcal{C}$ is the set of channels characterizing the constraints. Ankit Pensia, Amir-Reza Asadi, Varun S. Jog, Po-Ling Loh |
COLT | 2 |
| 2023 | On the Gibbs Exponential Mechanism and Private Synthetic Data GenerationabstractWe study the Gibbs exponential mechanism and its use in generating private synthetic data. We first present bounds on the expected utility of the Gibbs and generalized Gibbs mechanisms based on their privacy parameters. Next, we provide two notions of privacy and functionals of utility with respect to which the Gibbs mechanism is provably optimal among all mechanisms. These rely on a valuable property of Gibbs distributions relating them to relative entropy, called the Gibbs variational principle, and its extension to Rényi divergences and generalized moments. Finally, we study how to use the Gibbs mechanism to generate synthetic data privately. Combining known results in empirical process theory with the privacy-utility tradeoff results of this paper, we derive bounds on the utility of the Gibbs mechanism as a function of the size of the synthetic database. Amir-Reza Asadi, Po-Ling Loh |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2020 | Chaining Meets Chain Rule: Multilevel Entropic Regularization and Training of Neural NetworksabstractWe derive generalization and excess risk bounds for neural networks using a family of complexity measures based on a multilevel relative entropy. The bounds are obtained by introducing the notion of generated hierarchical coverings of neural networks and by using the technique of chaining mutual information introduced by Asadi et al. '18. The resulting bounds are algorithm-dependent and multiscale: they exploit the multilevel structure of neural networks. This, in turn, leads to an empirical risk minimization problem with a multilevel entropic regularization. The minimization problem is resolved by introducing a multiscale extension of the celebrated Gibbs posterior distribution, proving that the derived distribution achieves the unique minimum. This leads to a new training procedure for neural networks with performance guarantees, which exploits the chain rule of relative entropy rather than the chain rule of derivatives (as in backpropagation), and which takes into account the interactions between different scales of the hypothesis sets of neural networks corresponding to different depths of the hidden layers. To obtain an efficient implementation of the latter, we further develop a multilevel Metropolis algorithm simulating the multiscale Gibbs distribution, with an experiment for a two-layer neural network on the MNIST data set. Amir-Reza Asadi, Emmanuel Abbe |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2018 | Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization BoundsabstractBounding the generalization error of learning algorithms has a long history, which yet falls short in explaining various generalization successes including those of deep learning. Two important difficulties are (i) exploiting the dependencies between the hypotheses, (ii) exploiting the dependence between the algorithm’s input and output. Progress on the first point was made with the chaining method, originating from the work of Kolmogorov, and used in the VC-dimension bound. More recently, progress on the second point was made with the mutual information method by Russo and Zou ’15. Yet, these two methods are currently disjoint. In this paper, we introduce a technique to combine chaining and mutual information methods, to obtain a generalization bound that is both algorithm-dependent and that exploits the dependencies between the hypotheses. We provide an example in which our bound significantly outperforms both the chaining and the mutual information bounds. As a corollary, we tighten Dudley’s inequality when the learning algorithm chooses its output from a small subset of hypotheses with high probability. Amir-Reza Asadi, Emmanuel Abbe, Sergio Verdú |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Compressing data on graphs with clustersabstractThis paper investigates the fundamental limits for compressing data on graphs, exploiting dependencies due to community structures in the graph. The source model, referred to as the data block model (DBM), is a mixture of discrete memoryless sources determined by the community structure of a stochastic block model (SBM). The main result gives the optimal expected length of a lossless compressor when the community signal is strong enough, a condition on the edge probabilities and the data distributions, which can take place below the exact recovery threshold of the SBM. This is derived in part by obtaining the threshold for exact recovery in SBMs with strong side information, a result of independent interest, which extends the CH-divergence threshold. Finally we discuss compressing data with almost exact recovery algorithms. Amir-Reza Asadi, Emmanuel Abbe, Sergio Verdú |
ISIT | 1 |