Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Fernandez

dblp:309/5729 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
10since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
5 papers
Digital forensics and information hiding · 92% Security and privacy of machine learning · 8%
Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Generative modeling · 49% Segmentation and scene understanding · 14% Language models and text generation · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Audio and music processing · 79% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 21%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking
3.342025
Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models · NeurIPS 2025
Watermarking Autoregressive Image Generation · NeurIPS 2025
Watermark Anything With Localized Messages · ICLR 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
image watermarking
1.522025
Watermark Anything With Localized Messages · ICLR 2025
The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Models · ICCV 2023
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
generative model watermarking
1.122025
Watermarking Autoregressive Image Generation · NeurIPS 2025
Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
autoregressive image generation
0.912025
Watermarking Autoregressive Image Generation · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.912025
Watermark Anything With Localized Messages · ICLR 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › watermarking security › watermark attack
watermark forgery
0.912025
Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models · NeurIPS 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › watermarking security › watermark attack
watermark removal
0.912025
Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
synthetic data detection
0.812024
Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
watermarking
0.812024
Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive · NeurIPS 2024
Audio and music processing › audio security
audio watermarking
0.812024
Proactive Detection of Voice Cloning with Localized Watermarking · ICML 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
0.812024
Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive · NeurIPS 2024
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
watermark detection
0.812024
Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.712023
Active Image Indexing · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.712023
The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Models · ICCV 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model
0.712023
The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Models · ICCV 2023
Information retrieval › image retrieval
image indexing
0.712023
Active Image Indexing · ICLR 2023
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.712023
Active Image Indexing · ICLR 2023
Digital forensics and information hiding
steganography
0.312025
Watermark Anything With Localized Messages · ICLR 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › data provenance
content provenance
0.212023
The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Models · ICCV 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

watermark synchronization · 1.7tokenizer-detokenizer finetuning · 1.7joint training · 1.7deep learning · 1.7statistical hypothesis testing · 1.5perceptual loss · 1.5generator-detector architecture · 1.5auditory masking · 1.5statistical test · 1.3latent diffusion model fine-tuning · 1.3image embedding · 1.3active indexing · 1.3ranking loss · 0.9preference model · 0.9backpropagation-based image optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Latent Watermarking of Audio Generative Models
abstract
The advancements in audio generative models have opened up new challenges in their responsible disclosure and the detection of their misuse. To address this, watermarking techniques have been recently developed, enabling the detection of content generated by a deployed model. For such techniques to be useful, the watermark must resist typical modifications applied to the model or its outputs. The use case of an open-source model trained on proprietary data is challenging, as post-hoc watermarks can then be trivially removed. In response, we introduce a method that watermarks latent audio generative models by directly watermarking their training data. We show the method to be robust against a broad range of audio edits including filtering, compression or even to changing the model’s decoder, maintaining high detection rates with very few false positives. Interestingly, we show that even fine-tuning the model on another dataset can only significantly lower the detection rate at the cost of degrading the generation performance near the level of re-training the model without the protected training data.
Robin San-Roman, Pierre Fernandez, Antoine Deleforge, Yossi Adi, Romain Serizel
ICASSP2
2025 Watermark Anything With Localized Messages
abstract
Image watermarking methods are not tailored to handle small watermarked areas. This restricts applications in real-world scenarios where parts of the image may come from different sources or have been edited. We introduce a deep-learning model for localized image watermarking, dubbed the Watermark Anything Model (WAM). The WAM embedder imperceptibly modifies the input image, while the extractor segments the received image into watermarked and non-watermarked areas and recovers one or several hidden messages from the areas found to be watermarked. The models are jointly trained at low resolution and without perceptual constraints, then post-trained for imperceptibility and multiple watermarks. Experiments show that WAM is competitive with state-of-the art methods in terms of imperceptibility and robustness, especially against inpainting and splicing, even on high-resolution images. Moreover, it offers new capabilities: WAM can locate watermarked areas in spliced images and extract distinct 32-bit messages with less than 1 bit error from multiple small regions -- no larger than 10\% of the image surface -- even for small $256\times 256$ images. Training and inference code and model weights are available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/watermark-anything.
Tom Sander, Pierre Fernandez, Alain Durmus, Teddy Furon, Matthijs Douze
ICLR2
2025 Watermarking Autoregressive Image Generation
abstract
Watermarking the outputs of generative models has emerged as a promising approach for tracking their provenance. Despite significant interest in autoregressive image generation models and their potential for misuse, no prior work has attempted to watermark their outputs at the token level. In this work, we present the first such approach by adapting language model watermarking techniques to this setting. We identify a key challenge: the lack of reverse cycle-consistency (RCC), wherein re-tokenizing generated image tokens significantly alters the token sequence, effectively erasing the watermark. To address this and to make our method robust to common image transformations, neural compression, and removal attacks, we introduce (i) a custom tokenizer-detokenizer finetuning procedure that improves RCC, and (ii) a complementary watermark synchronization layer. As our experiments demonstrate, our approach enables reliable and robust watermark detection with theoretically grounded p-values. Code and models are available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/wmar.
Nikola Jovanovic 0001, Ismail Labiad, Tomás Soucek, Martin T. Vechev, Pierre Fernandez
NeurIPS5
2025 Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models
abstract
Recent years have seen a surge in interest in digital content watermarking techniques, driven by the proliferation of generative models and increased legal pressure. With an ever-growing percentage of AI-generated content available online, watermarking plays an increasingly important role in ensuring content authenticity and attribution at scale. There have been many works assessing the robustness of watermarking to removal attacks, yet, watermark forging, the scenario when a watermark is stolen from genuine content and applied to malicious content, remains underexplored. In this work, we investigate watermark forging in the context of widely used post-hoc image watermarking. Our contributions are as follows. First, we introduce a preference model to assess whether an image is watermarked. The model is trained using a ranking loss on purely procedurally generated images without any need for real watermarks. Second, we demonstrate the model's capability to remove and forge watermarks by optimizing the input image through backpropagation. This technique requires only a single watermarked image and works without knowledge of the watermarking model, making our attack much simpler and more practical than attacks introduced in related work. Third, we evaluate our proposed method on a variety of post-hoc image watermarking models, demonstrating that our approach can effectively forge watermarks, questioning the security of current watermarking approaches. Our code and further resources are publicly available.
Tomás Soucek, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Pierre Fernandez, Nikola Jovanovic 0001, Hady ElSahar, Valeriu Lacatusu, Alexandre Mourachko
NeurIPS3
2024 Functional Invariants To Watermark Large Transformers
abstract
The rapid growth of transformer-based models increases the concerns about their integrity and ownership insurance. Watermarking addresses this issue by embedding a unique identifier into the model, while preserving its performance. However, most existing approaches require to optimize the weights to imprint the watermark signal, which is not suitable at scale due to the computational cost. This paper explores watermarks with virtually no computational cost, applicable to a non-blind white-box setting (assuming access to both the original and watermarked networks). They generate functionally equivalent copies by leveraging the models’ invariance, via operations like dimension permutations or scaling/unscaling. This enables to watermark models without any change in their outputs and remains stealthy. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach and its robustness against various model transformations (fine-tuning, quantization, pruning), making it a practical solution to protect the integrity of large models.
Pierre Fernandez, Guillaume Couairon, Teddy Furon, Matthijs Douze
ICASSP1
2024 Proactive Detection of Voice Cloning with Localized Watermarking
abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of speech generative models, there is a pressing need to ensure audio authenticity against the risks of voice cloning. We present AudioSeal, the first audio watermarking technique designed specifically for localized detection of AI-generated speech. AudioSeal employs a generator / detector architecture trained jointly with a localization loss to enable localized watermark detection up to the sample level, and a novel perceptual loss inspired by auditory masking, that enables AudioSeal to achieve better imperceptibility. AudioSeal achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of robustness to real life audio manipulations and imperceptibility based on automatic and human evaluation metrics. Additionally, AudioSeal is designed with a fast, single-pass detector, that significantly surpasses existing models in speed, achieving detection up to two orders of magnitude faster, making it ideal for large-scale and real-time applications.Code is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/audioseal
Robin San-Roman, Pierre Fernandez, Hady ElSahar, Alexandre Défossez, Teddy Furon
ICML2
2024 Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive
abstract
We investigate the radioactivity of text generated by large language models (LLM), \ie whether it is possible to detect that such synthetic input was used to train a subsequent LLM. Current methods like membership inference or active IP protection either work only in settings where the suspected text is known or do not provide reliable statistical guarantees. We discover that, on the contrary, it is possible to reliably determine if a language model was trained on synthetic data if that data is output by a watermarked LLM. Our new methods, specialized for radioactivity, detects with a provable confidence weak residuals of the watermark signal in the fine-tuned LLM. We link the radioactivity contamination level to the following properties: the watermark robustness, its proportion in the training set, and the fine-tuning process. For instance, if the suspect model is open-weight, we demonstrate that training on watermarked instructions can be detected with high confidence ($p$-value $< 10^{-5}$) even when as little as $5\%$ of training text is watermarked.
Tom Sander, Pierre Fernandez, Alain Durmus, Matthijs Douze, Teddy Furon
NeurIPS2
2023 The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Models
abstract
Generative image modeling enables a wide range of applications but raises ethical concerns about responsible deployment. We introduce an active content tracing method combining image watermarking and Latent Diffusion Models. The goal is for all generated images to conceal an invisible watermark allowing for future detection and/or identification. The method quickly fine-tunes the latent decoder of the image generator, conditioned on a binary signature. A pre-trained watermark extractor recovers the hidden signature from any generated image and a statistical test then determines whether it comes from the generative model. We evaluate the invisibility and robustness of the watermarks on a variety of generation tasks, showing that the Stable Signature is robust to image modifications. For instance, it detects the origin of an image generated from a text prompt, then cropped to keep 10% of the content, with 90+% accuracy at a false positive rate below 10−6.
Pierre Fernandez, Guillaume Couairon, Hervé Jégou, Matthijs Douze, Teddy Furon
ICCV1
2023 Active Image Indexing
Pierre Fernandez, Matthijs Douze, Hervé Jégou, Teddy Furon
ICLR1
2022 Watermarking Images in Self-Supervised Latent Spaces
abstract
We revisit watermarking techniques based on pre-trained deep networks, in the light of self-supervised approaches. We present a way to embed both marks and binary messages into their latent spaces, leveraging data augmentation at marking time. Our method can operate at any resolution and creates watermarks robust to a broad range of transformations (rotations, crops, JPEG, contrast, etc). It significantly outperforms the previous zero-bit methods, and its performance on multi-bit watermarking is on par with state-of-the-art encoder-decoder architectures trained end-to-end for watermarking. The code is available at github.com/facebookresearch/ssl_watermarking.
Pierre Fernandez, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Teddy Furon, Hervé Jégou, Matthijs Douze
ICASSP1