Cyberattacks on operational technology are increasingly causing costly downtime and physical damage, exposing the limitations of traditional rule-based monitoring in industrial IoT environments. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have strong semantic reasoning abilities to assist in decision support, their hallucinatory nature presents unacceptable safety liabilities for closed-loop control. This paper introduces a neuro-agentic control framework, a novel architecture that couples an LLM-based planner (i.e., such as Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite) with a pre-trained Time-Series Foundation Model (TimesFM), to achieve physics-grounded autonomous defense. The paper introduces a ``Counterfactual Physics Injection'' mechanism that simulates the impact of LLM-proposed interventions within the numerical latent space of the foundation model before actuation, while allowing the system to reject hallucinatory or unsafe actions. Evaluated on an industrial dataset (e.g., the Secure Water Treatment (SWaT)) in the context of stochastic attack scenarios, the framework exhibited better performance compared to LSTM and TCN baselines. The Neuro-Agentic Loop prevented five breaches (33.3%) below the threshold versus LSTM (26.7%) and TCN (13.3%), with zero physically invalid (hallucinated) actions executed. These results demonstrate the efficacy of using foundation models as deterministic ``Sentinels'' to safeguard agentic AI in critical infrastructure.

This paper intends to detect IoT malicious attacks through deep learning models and demonstrates a comprehensive evaluation of the deep learning and graph-based models regarding malicious network traffic detection. The models particularly are based on GraphSAGE, Bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) as well as Multi-Head Attention, together with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BI-LSTM) Multi-Head Attention and BI-LSTM and LSTM models. The chosen models demonstrated great performance to model temporal patterns and detect feature significance. The observed performance are mainly due to the fact that IoT system traffic patterns are both sequential and diverse, leaving a rich set of temporal patterns for the models to learn. Experimental results showed that BERT maintained the best performance. It achieved 99.94% accuracy rate alongside high precision and recall, F1-score and AUC-ROC score of 99.99% which demonstrates its capabilities through temporal dependency capture. The Multi-Head Attention offered promising results by providing good detection capabilities with interpretable results. On the other side, the Multi-Head Attention model required significant processing time like BI-LSTM variants. The GraphSAGE model achieved good accuracy while requiring the shortest training time but yielded the lowest accuracy, precision, and F1 score compared to the other models.

Federated learning is a decentralized machine learning paradigm that allows multiple clients to collaborate by leveraging local computational power and the model’s transmission. This method reduces the costs and privacy concerns associated with centralized machine learning methods while ensuring data privacy by distributing training data across heterogeneous devices. On the other hand, federated learning has the drawback of data leakage due to the lack of privacy-preserving mechanisms employed during storage, transfer, and sharing, thus posing significant risks to data owners and suppliers. Blockchain technology has emerged as a promising technology for offering secure data-sharing platforms in federated learning, especially in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) settings. This survey aims to compare the performance and security of various data privacy mechanisms adopted in blockchain-based federated learning architectures. We conduct a systematic review of existing literature on secure data-sharing platforms for federated learning provided by blockchain technology, providing an in-depth overview of blockchain-based federated learning, its essential components, and discussing its principles, and potential applications. The primary contribution of this survey paper is to identify critical research questions and propose potential directions for future research in blockchain-based federated learning.

Various decentralized applications have deployed millions of smart contracts (SCs) on the Blockchain networks. SCs enable programmable transactions involving the transfer of monetary assets between peers on a Blockchain network without any need to a central authority. However, similar to any software program, SCs may contain security issues. Software se-curity engineers and researchers have already uncovered several Ethereum BlockChain and SC vulnerabilities. Still, researchers continuously discover many more security flaws in deployed SCs. Indeed, the popularity of SCs attracts adversaries to launch new attack vectors. Thus, efficient vulnerability detection is necessary. This paper lists broad known vulnerabilities in SCs and classifies them based on the multi-class categories such as Suicidal, Prodigal, Greedy, and Normal SCs. The paper adopts artificial recurrent neural network architecture such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) used in deep learning to identify and then classify vulnerable Scs.

There exist several data-driven approaches that enable us model time series data including traditional regression-based modeling approaches (i.e., ARIMA). Recently, deep learning techniques have been introduced and explored in the context of time series analysis and prediction. A major research question to ask is the performance of these many variations of deep learning techniques in predicting time series data. This paper compares two prominent deep learning modeling techniques. The Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)-based Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and the convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN) are compared and their performance and training time are reported. According to our experimental results, both modeling techniques per-form comparably having TCN-based models outperform LSTM slightly. Moreover, the CNN-based TCN model builds a stable model faster than the RNN-based LSTM models.