Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Siddharth Grover
dblp:309/6519
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Graph data management · 77% Indexing and storage engines · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GREED: A Neural Framework for Learning Graph Distance Functions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Graph data management
graph similarity search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GREED: A Neural Framework for Learning Graph Distance Functions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
siamese graph neural network · 1.1metric embedding · 1.1inductive bias · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | GREED: A Neural Framework for Learning Graph Distance FunctionsabstractSimilarity search in graph databases is one of the most fundamental operations in graph analytics. Among various distance functions, graph and subgraph edit distances (GED and SED respectively) are two of the most popular and expressive measures. Unfortunately, exact computations for both are NP-hard. To overcome this computational bottleneck, neural approaches to learn and predict edit distance in polynomial time have received much interest. While considerable progress has been made, there exist limitations that need to be addressed. First, the efficacy of an approximate distance function lies not only in its approximation accuracy, but also in the preservation of its properties. To elaborate, although GED is a metric, its neural approximations do not provide such a guarantee. This prohibits their usage in higher order tasks that rely on metric distance functions, such as clustering or indexing. Second, several existing frameworks for GED do not extend to SED due to SED being asymmetric. In this work, we design a novel siamese graph neural network called Greed, which through a carefully crafted inductive bias, learns GED and SED in a property-preserving manner. Through extensive experiments across $10$ real graph datasets containing up to $7$ million edges, we establish that Greed is not only more accurate than the state of the art, but also up to $3$ orders of magnitude faster. Even more significantly, due to preserving the triangle inequality, the generated embeddings are indexable and consequently, even in a CPU-only environment, Greed is up to $50$ times faster than GPU-powered computations of the closest baseline. Rishabh Ranjan, Siddharth Grover, Sourav Medya, Venkatesan T. Chakaravarthy, Yogish Sabharwal, Sayan Ranu |
NeurIPS | 2 |