Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Milena Gazdieva

dblp:309/6585 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 49% Generative modeling · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 5%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
1.622025
Robust Barycenter Estimation using Semi-Unbalanced Neural Optimal Transport · ICLR 2025
Estimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal Transport · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
1.522024
Energy-Guided Continuous Entropic Barycenter Estimation for General Costs · NeurIPS 2024
Light Unbalanced Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
unbalanced optimal transport
0.912025
Robust Barycenter Estimation using Semi-Unbalanced Neural Optimal Transport · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model
0.812024
Energy-Guided Continuous Entropic Barycenter Estimation for General Costs · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein barycenter
0.812024
Estimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal Transport · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
domain translation
0.712023
Extremal Domain Translation with Neural Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
neural optimal transport
0.712023
Extremal Domain Translation with Neural Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network › image-to-image translation
unsupervised image-to-image translation
0.712023
Extremal Domain Translation with Neural Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.212024
Estimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal Transport · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural optimal transport · 3.0dual formulation · 1.5adversarial learning · 1.5semi-unbalanced optimal transport · 0.9min-max optimization · 0.9weak optimal transport · 0.8universal approximation · 0.8non-minimax optimization · 0.8generalization bounds · 0.8dual reformulation · 0.8partial optimal transport · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Robust Barycenter Estimation using Semi-Unbalanced Neural Optimal Transport
abstract
Aggregating data from multiple sources can be formalized as an *Optimal Transport* (OT) barycenter problem, which seeks to compute the average of probability distributions with respect to OT discrepancies. However, in real-world scenarios, the presence of outliers and noise in the data measures can significantly hinder the performance of traditional statistical methods for estimating OT barycenters. To address this issue, we propose a novel scalable approach for estimating the *robust* continuous barycenter, leveraging the dual formulation of the *(semi-)unbalanced* OT problem. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first attempt to develop an algorithm for robust barycenters under the continuous distribution setup. Our method is framed as a $\min$-$\max$ optimization problem and is adaptable to *general* cost functions. We rigorously establish the theoretical underpinnings of the proposed method and demonstrate its robustness to outliers and class imbalance through a number of illustrative experiments. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/milenagazdieva/U-NOTBarycenters.
Milena Gazdieva, Jaemoo Choi, Alexander Kolesov, Jaewoong Choi, Petr Mokrov, Alexander Korotin
ICLR1
2024 Estimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal Transport
abstract
Given a collection of probability measures, a practitioner sometimes needs to find an "average" distribution which adequately aggregates reference distributions. A theoretically appealing notion of such an average is the Wasserstein barycenter, which is the primal focus of our work. By building upon the dual formulation of Optimal Transport (OT), we propose a new scalable approach for solving the Wasserstein barycenter problem. Our methodology is based on the recent Neural OT solver: it has bi-level adversarial learning objective and works for general cost functions. These are key advantages of our method since the typical adversarial algorithms leveraging barycenter tasks utilize tri-level optimization and focus mostly on quadratic cost. We also establish theoretical error bounds for our proposed approach and showcase its applicability and effectiveness in illustrative scenarios and image data setups. Our source code is available at https://github.com/justkolesov/NOTBarycenters.
Alexander Kolesov, Petr Mokrov, Igor Udovichenko, Milena Gazdieva, Gudmund Pammer, Evgeny Burnaev, Alexander Korotin
ICML4
2024 Light Unbalanced Optimal Transport
abstract
While the continuous Entropic Optimal Transport (EOT) field has been actively developing in recent years, it became evident that the classic EOT problem is prone to different issues like the sensitivity to outliers and imbalance of classes in the source and target measures. This fact inspired the development of solvers that deal with the *unbalanced* EOT (UEOT) problem $-$ the generalization of EOT allowing for mitigating the mentioned issues by relaxing the marginal constraints. Surprisingly, it turns out that the existing solvers are either based on heuristic principles or heavy-weighted with complex optimization objectives involving several neural networks. We address this challenge and propose a novel theoretically-justified, lightweight, unbalanced EOT solver. Our advancement consists of developing a novel view on the optimization of the UEOT problem yielding tractable and a non-minimax optimization objective. We show that combined with a light parametrization recently proposed in the field our objective leads to a fast, simple, and effective solver which allows solving the continuous UEOT problem in minutes on CPU. We prove that our solver provides a universal approximation of UEOT solutions and obtain its generalization bounds. We give illustrative examples of the solver's performance.
Milena Gazdieva, Arip Asadulaev, Evgeny Burnaev, Alexander Korotin
NeurIPS1
2024 Energy-Guided Continuous Entropic Barycenter Estimation for General Costs
abstract
Optimal transport (OT) barycenters are a mathematically grounded way of averaging probability distributions while capturing their geometric properties. In short, the barycenter task is to take the average of a collection of probability distributions w.r.t. given OT discrepancies. We propose a novel algorithm for approximating the continuous Entropic OT (EOT) barycenter for arbitrary OT cost functions. Our approach is built upon the dual reformulation of the EOT problem based on weak OT, which has recently gained the attention of the ML community. Beyond its novelty, our method enjoys several advantageous properties: (i) we establish quality bounds for the recovered solution; (ii) this approach seamlessly interconnects with the Energy-Based Models (EBMs) learning procedure enabling the use of well-tuned algorithms for the problem of interest; (iii) it provides an intuitive optimization scheme avoiding min-max, reinforce and other intricate technical tricks. For validation, we consider several low-dimensional scenarios and image-space setups, including *non-Euclidean* cost functions. Furthermore, we investigate the practical task of learning the barycenter on an image manifold generated by a pretrained generative model, opening up new directions for real-world applications. Our code is available at https://github.com/justkolesov/EnergyGuidedBarycenters.
Alexander Kolesov, Petr Mokrov, Igor Udovichenko, Milena Gazdieva, Gudmund Pammer, Anastasis Kratsios, Evgeny Burnaev, Alexander Korotin
NeurIPS4
2023 Extremal Domain Translation with Neural Optimal Transport
abstract
In many unpaired image domain translation problems, e.g., style transfer or super-resolution, it is important to keep the translated image similar to its respective input image. We propose the extremal transport (ET) which is a mathematical formalization of the theoretically best possible unpaired translation between a pair of domains w.r.t. the given similarity function. Inspired by the recent advances in neural optimal transport (OT), we propose a scalable algorithm to approximate ET maps as a limit of partial OT maps. We test our algorithm on toy examples and on the unpaired image-to-image translation task. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/milenagazdieva/ExtremalNeuralOptimalTransport
Milena Gazdieva, Alexander Korotin, Daniil Selikhanovych, Evgeny Burnaev
NeurIPS1