Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephanie Lam

dblp:309/8966 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-8976-7725ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 44% Parallel and multicore computing · 44% High-performance computing · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › sorting
parallel sorting algorithms
0.912025
Thicket Workflow for Classifying Parallel Sorting Algorithms · HPDC 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.912025
Thicket Workflow for Classifying Parallel Sorting Algorithms · HPDC 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thicket · 0.9scikit-learn · 0.9pytorch · 0.9machine learning · 0.9caliper · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Thicket Workflow for Classifying Parallel Sorting Algorithms
abstract
Understanding parallel algorithms is crucial for accelerating scientific simulations on complex, distributed memory, high-performance computers. Modern algorithm classification approaches learn semantics directly from source code to differentiate between algorithms, however, accessing source code is not always possible. We can learn about parallel algorithms from observing their performance, as programs running the same algorithms and using the same hardware should exhibit similar performance characteristics. We develop an approach to learn parallel sorting algorithm classes from performance data directly in order to classify parallel sorting algorithms without using the source code. In this paper, we focus on the workflow and interfaces we developed for collecting, processing, and modeling performance data using Caliper, Thicket, PyTorch, and Scikit-learn. Our workflow results in classification accuracy of our machine learning models up to 95.3% across five different algorithm classes.
Michael McKinsey, Stephanie Brink, Stephanie Lam, Dewi Yokelson, Olga Pearce
HPDC3