Fast and accurate 3D shape generation from point clouds is essential for real-world applications such as robotics, AR/VR, and digital content creation. We present ConTiCoM-3D, a continuous-time consistency model that generates 3D shapes directly in point space, without relying on discretized diffusion steps, pre-trained teacher models, or latent-space encodings. Our approach combines a TrigFlow-inspired continuous noise schedule with a Chamfer Distance-based geometric loss, providing stable training in high-dimensional point sets while avoiding costly Jacobian-vector products. This enables efficient one- to two-step inference with high geometric fidelity. Unlike previous methods that require iterative denoising or latent decoders, ConTiCoM-3D operates entirely in continuous time with a time-conditioned neural network, achieving fast generation. Extensive experiments on the ShapeNet benchmark demonstrate that our method matches or surpasses leading diffusion and latent consistency models in both quality and efficiency, establishing ConTiCoM-3D as a practical solution for scalable 3D shape generation.

Empirical research plays a fundamental role in the machine learning domain. At the heart of impactful empirical research lies the development of clear research hypotheses, which then shape the design of experiments. The execution of experiments must be carried out with precision to ensure reliable results, followed by statistical analysis to interpret these outcomes. This process is key to either supporting or refuting initial hypotheses. Despite its importance, there is a high variability in research practices across the machine learning community and no uniform understanding of quality criteria for empirical research. To address this gap, we propose a model for the empirical research process, accompanied by guidelines to uphold the validity of empirical research. By embracing these recommendations, greater consistency, enhanced reliability and increased impact can be achieved.

In this paper, we tackle the problem of planning in complex numerical domains, where actions are indexed by control parameters, and their effects may be described by neural networks. We propose a lazy, hierarchical approach based on two ingredients. First, a Satisfiability Modulo Theory solver looks for an abstract plan where the neural networks in the model are abstracted into uninterpreted functions. Then, we attempt to concretize the abstract plan by querying the neural network to determine the control parameters. If the concretization fails and no valid control parameters could be found, suitable information to refine the abstraction is lifted to the Satisfiability Modulo Theory model. We contrast our work against the state of the art in NN-enriched numerical planning, where the neural network is eagerly and exactly represented as terms in Satisfiability Modulo Theories over nonlinear real arithmetic. Our systematic evaluation on four different planning domains shows that avoiding symbolic reasoning about the neural network not only leads to substantial efficiency improvements, but also enables their integration as black-box models.

To improve the autonomy of Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS), a growing number of approaches in Artificial Intelligence (AI) is developed. However, implementations of such approaches are often validated on individual use-cases, offering little to no comparability. Though CPPS automation includes a variety of problem domains, existing benchmarks usually focus on single or partial problems. Additionally, they often neglect to test for AI-specific performance indicators, like asymptotic complexity scenarios or runtimes. Within this paper we identify minimum common set requirements for AI benchmarks in the domain of CPPS and introduce a comprehensive benchmark, offering applicability on diagnosis, reconfiguration, and planning approaches from AI. The benchmark consists of a grid of datasets derived from 16 simulations of modular CPPS from process engineering, featuring multiple functionalities, complexities, and individual and superposed faults. We evaluate the benchmark on state-of-the-art AI approaches in diagnosis, reconfiguration, and planning. The benchmark is made publicly available on GitHub.