Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jason T. Parker

dblp:31/11106 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › mathematical imaging › inverse imaging
inverse scattering
0.112012
Single Frequency Inverse Obstacle Scattering: A Sparsity Constrained Linear Sampling Method Approach · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012
Image and video processing
compressive sensing
0.112010
Sparsity and Compressed Sensing in Radar Imaging · Proc. IEEE 2010
Image and video processing
radar imaging
0.112010
Sparsity and Compressed Sensing in Radar Imaging · Proc. IEEE 2010
Image and video processing › sparse representation
sparse reconstruction
0.112010
Sparsity and Compressed Sensing in Radar Imaging · Proc. IEEE 2010
Image and video processing › image restoration › inverse problem
inverse problem regularization
0.012010
Sparsity and Compressed Sensing in Radar Imaging · Proc. IEEE 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tikhonov regularization · 0.1spatial gradient regularization · 0.1sparsity-constrained regularization · 0.1sparse reconstruction · 0.1randomized measurement · 0.1compressed sensing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Single Frequency Inverse Obstacle Scattering: A Sparsity Constrained Linear Sampling Method Approach
abstract
The linear sampling method (LSM) offers a qualitative image reconstruction approach, which is known as a viable alternative for obstacle support identification to the well-studied filtered backprojection (FBP), which depends on a linearized forward scattering model. Of practical interest is the imaging of obstacles from sparse aperture far-field data under a fixed single frequency mode of operation. Under this scenario, the Tikhonov regularization typically applied to LSM produces poor images that fail to capture the obstacle boundary. In this paper, we employ an alternative regularization strategy based on constraining the sparsity of the solution's spatial gradient. Two regularization approaches based on the spatial gradient are developed. A numerical comparison to the FBP demonstrates that the new method's ability to account for aspect-dependent scattering permits more accurate reconstruction of concave obstacles, whereas a comparison to Tikhonov-regularized LSM demonstrates that the proposed approach significantly improves obstacle recovery with sparse-aperture data.
Hatim F. Alqadah, Matthew Ferrara, H. Howard Fan, Jason T. Parker
IEEE Trans. Image Process.4
2010 Sparsity and Compressed Sensing in Radar Imaging
abstract
Remote sensing with radar is typically an ill-posed linear inverse problem: a scene is to be inferred from limited measurements of scattered electric fields. Parsimonious models provide a compressed representation of the unknown scene and offer a means for regularizing the inversion task. The emerging field of compressed sensing combines nonlinear reconstruction algorithms and pseudorandom linear measurements to provide reconstruction guarantees for sparse solutions to linear inverse problems. This paper surveys the use of sparse reconstruction algorithms and randomized measurement strategies in radar processing. Although the two themes have a long history in radar literature, the accessible framework provided by compressed sensing illuminates the impact of joining these themes. Potential future directions are conjectured both for extension of theory motivated by practice and for modification of practice based on theoretical insights.
Lee C. Potter, Emre Ertin, Jason T. Parker, Müjdat Çetin
Proc. IEEE3