VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
David J. Martin 0001
dblp:31/2559-1
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 76% Mathematical optimization · 24% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
sponsored search auction |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | Shared Winner Determination in Sponsored Search Auctions · ICDE 2009 Toward Expressive and Scalable Sponsored Search Auctions · ICDE 2008 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory › combinatorial auction
winner determination |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | Shared Winner Determination in Sponsored Search Auctions · ICDE 2009 Toward Expressive and Scalable Sponsored Search Auctions · ICDE 2008 |
Privacy and data protection › anonymization
data sanitization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Worst-Case Background Knowledge for Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing · ICDE 2007 |
Privacy and data protection › data publishing
privacy-preserving data publishing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Worst-Case Background Knowledge for Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing · ICDE 2007 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Shared Winner Determination in Sponsored Search Auctions · ICDE 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
shared sort · 0.1shared aggregation · 0.1expressive bidding mechanisms · 0.1polynomial-time algorithm · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Shared Winner Determination in Sponsored Search AuctionsabstractSponsored search auctions form a multibillion dollar industry. Search providers auction advertisement slots on search result pages to advertisers who are charged only if the end-user clicks on the advertiser's ad. The high volume of searches presents an opportunity for sharing the workrequired to resolve multiple auctions that occur simultaneously. We provide techniques for efficiently resolving sponsored search auctions involving large numbers of advertisers, with a focus on two issues: sharing work between multiple search auctions using shared aggregation and shared sort, and dealing with budget uncertainty arising from ads that have been displayed from previous auctions but have not received clicks yet. David J. Martin 0001, Joseph Y. Halpern |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2008 | Toward Expressive and Scalable Sponsored Search AuctionsabstractInternet search results are a growing and highly profitable advertising platform. Search providers auction advertising slots to advertisers on their search result pages. Due to the high volume of searches and the users' low tolerance for search result latency, it is imperative to resolve these auctions fast. Current approaches restrict the expressiveness of bids in order to achieve fast winner determination, which is the problem of allocating slots to advertisers so as to maximize the expected revenue given the advertisers' bids. The goal of our work is to permit more expressive bidding, thus allowing advertisers to achieve complex advertising goals, while still providing fast and scalable techniques for winner determination. David J. Martin 0001, Johannes Gehrke, Joseph Y. Halpern |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2007 | Worst-Case Background Knowledge for Privacy-Preserving Data PublishingabstractRecent work has shown the necessity of considering an attacker's background knowledge when reasoning about privacy in data publishing. However, in practice, the data publisher does not know what background knowledge the attacker possesses. Thus, it is important to consider the worst-case. In this paper, we initiate a formal study of worst-case background knowledge. We propose a language that can express any background knowledge about the data. We provide a polynomial time algorithm to measure the amount of disclosure of sensitive information in the worst case, given that the attacker has at most k pieces of information in this language. We also provide a method to efficiently sanitize the data so that the amount of disclosure in the worst case is less than a specified threshold. David J. Martin 0001, Daniel Kifer, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Johannes Gehrke, Joseph Y. Halpern |
ICDE | 1 |