Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lars Grammel

dblp:31/2796 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.112012
WorkItemExplorer: Visualizing software development tasks using an interactive exploration environment · ICSE 2012
Visualization and visual analytics
visualization generation
0.112010
How Information Visualization Novices Construct Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2010
Visualization and visual analytics
interactive data exploration
0.012012
WorkItemExplorer: Visualizing software development tasks using an interactive exploration environment · ICSE 2012
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics
exploratory data analysis
0.012010
How Information Visualization Novices Construct Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

coordinated multiple views · 0.3qualitative observation · 0.1laboratory study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 WorkItemExplorer: Visualizing software development tasks using an interactive exploration environment
abstract
This demo introduces WorkItemExplorer, an interactive environment to visually explore data from software development tasks. WorkItemExplorer enables developers and managers to investigate activity and correlations in their task management system by making data exploration flexible and interactive, and by utilizing multiple coordinated views. Our preliminary evaluation shows that WorkItemExplorer is able to answer questions that developers ask, while also enabling them to gain new insights through the free exploration of data.
Christoph Treude, Patrick Gorman, Lars Grammel, Margaret-Anne D. Storey
ICSE3
2011 Erratum to "How Information Visualization Novices Construct Visualizations"
Lars Grammel, Melanie Tory, Margaret-Anne D. Storey
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1
2010 How Information Visualization Novices Construct Visualizations
abstract
It remains challenging for information visualization novices to rapidly construct visualizations during exploratory data analysis. We conducted an exploratory laboratory study in which information visualization novices explored fictitious sales data by communicating visualization specifications to a human mediator, who rapidly constructed the visualizations using commercial visualization software. We found that three activities were central to the iterative visualization construction process: data attribute selection, visual template selection, and visual mapping specification. The major barriers faced by the participants were translating questions into data attributes, designing visual mappings, and interpreting the visualizations. Partial specification was common, and the participants used simple heuristics and preferred visualizations they were already familiar with, such as bar, line and pie charts. We derived abstract models from our observations that describe barriers in the data exploration process and uncovered how information visualization novices think about visualization specifications. Our findings support the need for tools that suggest potential visualizations and support iterative refinement, that provide explanations and help with learning, and that are tightly integrated into tool support for the overall visual analytics process.
Lars Grammel, Melanie Tory, Margaret-Anne D. Storey
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1
2009 Creating Visualizations through Ontology Mapping
abstract
We explore how to support the creation of customized visualizations of ontology instance data through the specification of ontology mappings. We combine technologies from the disciplines of software modeling and ontology engineering. The feasibility of our approach is demonstrated by extending an existing ontology mapping tool, CogZ, to translate ontology mappings into software model transformation rules. The tool uses these transformations to automatically convert domain instance data into data that conforms to a model describing a visualization. After this transformation, a visualization of the domain instance data is generated.
Sean M. Falconer, R. Ian Bull, Lars Grammel, Margaret-Anne D. Storey
CISIS3
2009 Supporting end users in analyzing multiple data sources
abstract
The analysis of data from multiple sources promises rich insights into complex phenomena. However, such an analysis requires data integration, which remains difficult for users without programming skills. In order to enable those users to perform ad-hoc data analysis of multiple data sources, we are researching their cognitive support needs and developing tools that provide appropriate cognitive support for this task. As part of this, we are exploring a widget-centric data integration and analysis approach.
Lars Grammel
VL/HCC1