Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pavel Paclík

dblp:31/4619 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 67% Machine learning and data management · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.012001
A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › nearest neighbor classification
distance-based classification
0.012001
A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning and data management
kernel methods
0.012001
A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.012001
A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dissimilarity representation · 0.1kernels · 0.0kernel · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 SEDMI: Saliency based edge detection in multispectral images
Viet Cuong Dinh, Raimund Leitner, Pavel Paclík, Marco Loog, Robert P. W. Duin
Image Vis. Comput.3
2010 ROC Analysis and Cost-Sensitive Optimization for Hierarchical Classifiers
abstract
Instead of solving complex pattern recognition problems using a single complicated classifier, it is often beneficial to leverage our prior knowledge and decompose the problem into parts. These may be tackled using specific feature subsets and simpler classifiers resulting in a hierarchical system. In this paper, we propose an efficient and scalable approach for cost-sensitive optimization of a general hierarchical classifier using ROC analysis. This allows the designer to view the hierarchy of trained classifiers as a system, and tune it according to the application needs.
Pavel Paclík, Carmen Lai, Thomas C. W. Landgrebe, Robert P. W. Duin
ICPR1
2010 The ROC skeleton for multiclass ROC estimation
Thomas C. W. Landgrebe, Pavel Paclík
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2
2008 Variance estimation for two-class and multi-class ROC analysis using operating point averaging
abstract
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis enables fine-tuning of a trained classifier to a desired performance trade-off situation. ROC estimated from a finite test set is, however, insufficient for the sake of classifier comparison as it neglects performance variances. This research presents a practical algorithm for variance estimation at individual operating points of ROC curves or surfaces. It generalizes the threshold averaging of Fawcett et.al. to arbitrary operating point definition including the weighting-based formulation used in multi-class ROC analysis. The statistical test comparing performance differences between operating points of the same curve is illustrated for two-class and multi-class ROC.
Pavel Paclík, Carmen Lai, Jana Novovicová, Robert P. W. Duin
ICPR1
2007 Does SVM Really Scale Up to Large Bag of Words Feature Spaces?
Fabrice Colas, Pavel Paclík, Joost N. Kok, Pavel Brazdil
IDA2
2006 Prototype selection for dissimilarity-based classifiers
Elzbieta Pekalska, Robert P. W. Duin, Pavel Paclík
Pattern Recognit.3
2006 The interaction between classification and reject performance for distance-based reject-option classifiers
Thomas C. W. Landgrebe, David M. J. Tax, Pavel Paclík, Robert P. W. Duin
Pattern Recognit. Lett.3
2006 Building Road-Sign Classifiers Using a Trainable Similarity Measure
abstract
Deriving an informative data representation is an important prerequisite when designing road-sign classifiers. A frequently used strategy for road-sign classification is based on the normalized cross correlation similarity to class prototypes followed by the nearest neighbor classifier. Because of the global nature of the cross correlation similarity, this method suffers from presence of uninformative pixels (caused, e.g., by occlusions) and is computationally demanding. In this paper, a novel concept of a trainable similarity measure is introduced, which alleviates these shortcomings. The similarity is based on individual matches in a set of local image regions. The set of regions that are relevant for a particular similarity assessment is refined by the training process. It is illustrated on a set of experiments with road-sign-classification problems that the trainable similarity yields high-performance data representations and classifiers. Apart from a multiclass classification accuracy, nonsign rejection capability and computational demands in execution are also discussed. It appears that the trainable similarity representation alleviates some difficulties of other algorithms that are currently used in road-sign classification.
Pavel Paclík, Jana Novovicová, Robert P. W. Duin
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.1
2004 A Study On Combining Image Representations For Image Classification And Retrieval
abstract
A flexible description of images is offered by a cloud of points in a feature space. In the context of image retrieval such clouds can be represented in a number of ways. Two approaches are here considered. The first approach is based on the assumption of a normal distribution, hence homogeneous clouds, while the second one focuses on the boundary description, which is more suitable for multimodal clouds. The images are then compared either by using the Mahalanobis distance or by the support vector data description (SVDD), respectively. The paper investigates some possibilities of combining the image clouds based on the idea that responses of several cloud descriptions may convey a pattern, specific for semantically similar images. A ranking of image dissimilarities is used as a comparison for two image databases targeting image classification and retrieval problems. We show that combining of the SVDD descriptions improves the retrieval performance with respect to ranking, on the contrary to the Mahalanobis case. Surprisingly, it turns out that the ranking of the Mahalanobis distances works well also for inhomogeneous images.
Carmen Lai, David M. J. Tax, Robert P. W. Duin, Elzbieta Pekalska, Pavel Paclík
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell.5
2003 Segmentation of multi-spectral images using the combined classifier approach
Pavel Paclík, Robert P. W. Duin, Geert M. P. van Kempen, Reinhard Kohlus
Image Vis. Comput.1
2001 A Generalized Kernel Approach to Dissimilarity-based Classification
Elzbieta Pekalska, Pavel Paclík, Robert P. W. Duin
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2000 Road sign classification using Laplace kernel classifier
Pavel Paclík, Jana Novovicová, Pavel Pudil, Petr Somol
Pattern Recognit. Lett.1
1999 Adaptive floating search methods in feature selection
Petr Somol, Pavel Pudil, Jana Novovicová, Pavel Paclík
Pattern Recognit. Lett.4