Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timothy A. Grogan

dblp:31/503 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › motion estimation
area-based optical flow
0.021994
On Poisson Solvers and Semi-Direct Methods for Computing Area Based Optical Flow · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
On Poisson solvers and semi-direct methods for computing area based optical flow · CVPR 1992
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow
0.021994
On Poisson Solvers and Semi-Direct Methods for Computing Area Based Optical Flow · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
On Poisson solvers and semi-direct methods for computing area based optical flow · CVPR 1992
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation
poisson solver
0.021994
On Poisson Solvers and Semi-Direct Methods for Computing Area Based Optical Flow · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
On Poisson solvers and semi-direct methods for computing area based optical flow · CVPR 1992
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.011990
Uniqueness, the minimum norm constraint, and analog networks for optical flow along contours · ICCV 1990
Image and video processing › motion estimation › optical flow
variational optical flow
0.011994
On Poisson Solvers and Semi-Direct Methods for Computing Area Based Optical Flow · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-direct method · 0.0poisson solver · 0.0concus-golub method · 0.0smoothness constraint · 0.0analog network · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 On Poisson Solvers and Semi-Direct Methods for Computing Area Based Optical Flow
abstract
Simchony, Chellappa, and Shao (1990) proposed a semi-direct method for computing area based optical flow. Their method is based on the iterative application of a direct Poisson solver. This method is restricted to Dirichlet boundary conditions, i.e., it is applicable only when velocity vectors at the boundary of the domain are known a priori. The authors show, both experimentally and through analysis, that the semi-direct method converges only for very large smoothness. At such levels of smoothness, the solution is obtained merely by filling in the known boundary values; the data from the image is almost totally ignored. Next, the authors consider the Concus and Golub method (1973), another semi-direct method, for computing optical flow. This method always converges, but the convergence is too slow to be of any practical value. The authors conclude that semi-direct methods are not suited for the computation of area based optical flow.>
Atul K. Chhabra, Timothy A. Grogan
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1992 On Poisson solvers and semi-direct methods for computing area based optical flow
abstract
T. Simchony et al. (1990) proposed a semidirect method for computing area-based optical flow, based on the iterative application of a direct Poisson solver. This method is restricted to Dirichlet boundary conditions, i.e. it is applicable only when velocity vectors at the boundary of the domain are known a priori. It is shown, both experimentally and through analysis, that the semidirect method converges only for a very high degree of smoothness. At such levels of smoothness, the solution is obtained merely by filling in the known boundary values; the data from the image is almost totally ignored. It is concluded that the semidirect method is not suited for the computation of area-based optical flow.>
Atul K. Chhabra, Timothy A. Grogan
CVPR2
1990 Uniqueness, the minimum norm constraint, and analog networks for optical flow along contours
abstract
E. Hildreth's (1984) method of computing optical flow along contours cannot resolve the aperture problem for a rigidly translating straight line contour. The authors propose an additional constraint, which they call the minimum norm constraint, as a means of resolving the ambiguity for such a contour. The minimum norm constraint tends to drive the velocity estimate towards the direction normal to the contour everywhere along the contour, i.e., it counters the effect of the smoothness constraint. This is in accord with recent psychophysical studies of K. Nakayama and G. Silverman (1988) which have revealed the presence of such a tendency in the human visual system. The authors propose an analog network for computing contour based optical flow in real-time. They illustrate the minimum norm constraint through experiments.>
Atul K. Chhabra, Timothy A. Grogan
ICCV2
1990 Vision, analog networks, and the minimum norm constraint
abstract
Several analog networks have been proposed for solving the variational problems of early vision. The networks can be implemented in hardware using analog VLSI: thus, they can be used in real-time environments. The underlying mathematical formulations do not necessarily lead to a unique solution. The authors show how the nonuniqueness carries over to the analog networks. In particular, they study networks for contour-based optical flow, area-based optical flow, membrane surface reconstruction, and thin-plate surface reconstruction. An additional constraint, the minimum norm constraint, is proposed in the variational formulations of these problems. The minimum norm constraint ensures a unique solution. In analog networks, the constraint can be imposed simply by shunting each node to ground through an appropriate positive resistor. The minimum norm constraint also tends to force the solution to conform more with local measurements. This is in accord with a psychophysical study which has revealed the presence of such a tendency in the human visual system
Atul K. Chhabra, Timothy A. Grogan
IJCNN2