Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matt Paduano
dblp:31/9988
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 44% Web and mobile security · 44% Privacy and data protection · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and mobile security › online advertising fraud
click fraud detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Estimating the number of users behind ip addresses for combating abusive traffic · KDD 2011 |
Network security › attack resilience › attack mitigation › denial-of-service defense
DDoS defense |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Estimating the number of users behind ip addresses for combating abusive traffic · KDD 2011 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Estimating the number of users behind ip addresses for combating abusive traffic · KDD 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical estimation · 0.1log mining · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Estimating the number of users behind ip addresses for combating abusive trafficabstractThis paper addresses estimating the number of the users of a specific application behind IP addresses (IPs). This problem is central to combating abusive traffic, such as DDoS attacks, ad click fraud and email spam. We share our experience building a general framework at Google for estimating the number of users behind IPs, called hereinafter the sizes of the IPs. The primary goal of this framework is combating abusive traffic without violating the user privacy. The estimation techniques produce statistically sound estimates of sizes relying solely on passively mining aggregated application log data, without probing machines or deploying active content like Java applets. This paper also explores using the estimated sizes to detect and filter abusive traffic. The proposed framework was used to build and deploy an ad click fraud filter at Google. The first 50M clicks tagged by the filter had a significant recall of all tagged clicks, and their false positive rate was below 1.4%. For the sake of comparison, we simulated a naive IP-based filter that does not consider the sizes of the IPs. To reach a comparable recall, the naive filter's false positive rate was 37% due to aggressive tagging. Ahmed Metwally 0001, Matt Paduano |
KDD | 2 |