VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Piotr Sowinski
dblp:310/1628
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-2543-9461ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Eficiency of REST and gRPC Realizing Communication Tasks in Microservice-Based EcosystemsabstractThe aim of this contribution is to analyse practical aspects of the use of REST APIs and gRPC to realize communication tasks in applications in microservice-based ecosystems. On the basis of performed experiments, classes of communication tasks, for which given technology performs data transfer more efficiently, have been established. This, in turn, allows formulation of criteria for the selection of appropriate communication methods for communication tasks to be performed in an application using microservices-based architecture. Marek Bolanowski, Kamil Zak, Andrzej Paszkiewicz, Maria Ganzha, Marcin Paprzycki, Piotr Sowinski, Ignacio Lacalle, Carlos Enrique Palau |
SoMeT | 6 |
| 2022 | Ontology Reuse: The Real Test of Ontological DesignabstractReusing ontologies in practice is still very challenging, especially when multiple ontologies are (jointly) involved. Moreover, despite recent advances, the realization of systematic ontology quality assurance remains a difficult problem. In this work, the quality of thirty biomedical ontologies, and the Computer Science Ontology are investigated, from the perspective of a practical use case. Special scrutiny is given to cross-ontology references, which are vital for combining ontologies. Diverse methods to detect potential issues are proposed, including natural language processing and network analysis. Moreover, several suggestions for improving ontologies and their quality assurance processes are presented. It is argued that while the advancing automatic tools for ontology quality assurance are crucial for ontology improvement, they will not solve the problem entirely. It is ontology reuse that is the ultimate method for continuously verifying and improving ontology quality, as well as for guiding its future development. Specifically, multiple issues can be found and fixed primarily through practical and diverse ontology reuse scenarios. Piotr Sowinski, Katarzyna Wasielewska-Michniewska, Maria Ganzha, Marcin Paprzycki, Costin Badica |
SoMeT | 1 |