Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rui Ou

dblp:311/0446 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-5225-3219ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 76% Learning paradigms · 19% Representation and self-supervised learning · 6%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 87% Data stream processing · 13%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
2.022026
STG-DGR: Fraud Detection on Streaming Transaction Graphs with Diffusion-based Generative Replay · WWW 2026
Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network training
continual graph learning
1.012026
STG-DGR: Fraud Detection on Streaming Transaction Graphs with Diffusion-based Generative Replay · WWW 2026
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › rehearsal-based continual learning
generative replay
1.012026
STG-DGR: Fraud Detection on Streaming Transaction Graphs with Diffusion-based Generative Replay · WWW 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph anomaly detection
graph fraud detection
1.012026
Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026
Data mining
anomaly detection
1.012026
STG-DGR: Fraud Detection on Streaming Transaction Graphs with Diffusion-based Generative Replay · WWW 2026
Data mining › anomaly detection
fraud detection
1.012026
STG-DGR: Fraud Detection on Streaming Transaction Graphs with Diffusion-based Generative Replay · WWW 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.312026
Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026
Data stream processing › evolving data
concept drift
0.312026
STG-DGR: Fraud Detection on Streaming Transaction Graphs with Diffusion-based Generative Replay · WWW 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 2.0hierarchical denoising network · 2.0diffusion model · 2.0large language model · 1.0hypergraph attention · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive Learning
abstract
Graph fraud detection (GFD) on transaction networks is crucial for safeguarding financial systems. However, due to the limited perspective of existing graph neural networks (GNNs) in the single transaction view, sophisticated fraudsters can disguise themselves to exhibit weak fraud signals, appearing as borderline fraudsters. To address this challenge, we propose MH-LGC, a multi-view hypergraph fraud detection model with large language model (LLM) guided contrastive learning. MH-LGC tackles two key limitations of existing GNN-based GFD methods: (1) Due to the local aggregation mechanism, existing methods struggle to capture high-order trading patterns among distant fraudsters. MH-LGC introduces two temporal hyper-views as complements to the transaction view and employs a Temporal Hypergraph Attention Network (THAN) to integrate the three views. (2) Most GFD methods overlook the rich semantic cues embedded in transaction data. Although some general graph learning studies have explored LLM integration, the high computational overhead and task-specific fine-tuning make them impractical for GFD tasks. MH-LGC introduces a semantic view through a fine-tuning-free LLM-Guided Contrastive learning (LGC), adopting a novel paradigm for integrating GNN and LLM to reduce the computational overhead of LLM. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that MH-LGC outperforms twelve state-of-the-art baselines, with AUC improvements ranging from 1.10% to 5.70%.
Rui Ou, Kun Zhu 0024, Jiangtong Li, Chaochao Chen 0001, Yuhua Xu 0011, Changjun Jiang 0002
AAAI1
2026 STG-DGR: Fraud Detection on Streaming Transaction Graphs with Diffusion-based Generative Replay
abstract
Fraud detection on streaming transaction graphs (STGs) faces challenges on the catastrophic forgetting of previously learned fraud patterns when adapting to evolving patterns. Although some Graph Continual Learning (GCL) approaches mitigate this issue by storing and revisiting historical samples, practical storage constraints prevent them from fully preserving previous patterns. In this work, we propose STG-DGR, a streaming GNN model with diffusion-based generative replay that generates synthetic samples to retain previously learned patterns without storing real samples. The generation of replay samples for STGs faces two key challenges: (1) Heterogeneity challenge of generating STG samples with discrete adjacency table, user features, transaction features, and transaction timestamps. (2) Dependency challenge of capturing bottom-up dependencies across layers in STG samples. To address these challenges, STG-DGR integrates two novel components: (1) a Computational Subgraph Processor (CSP) that transforms heterogeneous STG samples into well-organized hierarchical subgraphs, and (2) a Diffusion-based Subgraph Generator (DSG) that captures the bottom-up dependencies using a novel Transformer-based Hierarchical Denoising Network (THDN), and generates synthetic replay samples that preserve these dependencies. Extensive experiments on four streaming fraud detection datasets demonstrate STG-DGR's superiority in reducing forgetting and improving accuracy over nineteen state-of-the-art baselines.
Rui Ou, Kun Zhu 0024, Jiangtong Li, Chaochao Chen 0001, Changjun Jiang 0002
WWW1
2026 CamFD: Semi-Supervised Camouflage-Aware Fraud Detection Based on Dynamic Graphs
abstract
Fraud detection on dynamic graph (FDDG) is in high demand across many real-world applications, such as financial transaction networks and social networks. A graph neural network (GNN) is an advanced methodology for learning graph data and has been widely adopted in fraud detection tasks. Despite the promising results, research on GNN-based fraud detection faces two critical challenges. First, due to the lack of temporal consistency mining in existing methods, camouflaged fraudsters can easily evade detection by imitating the behavioral patterns of benign users. Second, with constantly evolving fraud patterns and a scarcity of fraud samples, existing methods can easily overfit to current fraud patterns and struggle to identify the evolved and new ones. To address these challenges, we propose CamFD, a semi-supervised camouflage-aware fraud detection model on dynamic graphs. To detect the temporal inconsistency in the behavioral patterns of camouflaged fraudsters, CamFD is equipped with a novel consistency-sensitive contrastive learning (CSCL) module. CSCL discriminatively learns the consistency and inconsistency in users’ behavioral patterns by constructing temporal and structural contrastive pairs. Since modeling the evolving fraud patterns with sparse fraud samples is almost impractical, CamFD concentrates on modeling the relatively stable patterns of extensive benign users with a multivariate Gaussian distribution modeling (MGDM) module. We conduct extensive experiments on a private credit card fraud dataset as well as three public datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that CamFD outperforms ten state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines across all datasets, with the area under ROC curve (AUC) improvements ranging from 1.03% to 5.32%.
Rui Ou, Kun Zhu 0024, MengChu Zhou, Changjun Jiang 0002
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst.1