Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandra Iacob

dblp:311/4195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-0836-6029ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
influence maximization
0.712023
Sequential Learning Algorithms for Contextual Model-Free Influence Maximization · KDD 2023
Mathematical optimization
sequential decision making
0.712023
Sequential Learning Algorithms for Contextual Model-Free Influence Maximization · KDD 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-free learning · 1.3contextual bandit · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Sequential Learning Algorithms for Contextual Model-Free Influence Maximization
abstract
International audience
Alexandra Iacob, Bogdan Cautis, Silviu Maniu
KDD1
2022 Contextual Bandits for Advertising Campaigns: A Diffusion-Model Independent Approach
abstract
Motivated by scenarios of information diffusion and advertising in social media, we study an influence maximization problem in which little is assumed to be known about the diffusion network or about the model that determines how information may propagate. In such a highly uncertain environment, one can focus on multiround diffusion campaigns, with the objective to maximize the number of distinct users that are influenced or activated, starting from a known base of few influential nodes. During a campaign, spread seeds are selected sequentially at consecutive rounds, and feedback is collected in the form of the activated nodes at each round. A round's impact (reward) is then quantified as the number of newly activated nodes. Overall, one must maximize the campaign's total spread, as the sum of rounds' rewards. In this setting, an explore-exploit approach could be used to learn the key underlying diffusion parameters, while running the campaign. We describe and compare two methods of contextual multi-armed bandits, with upper-confidence bounds on the remaining potential of influencers, one using a generalized linear model and the Good-Turing estimator for remaining potential (GLM-GT-UCB), and another one that directly adapts the LinUCB algorithm to our setting (LogNorm-LinUCB). We show that they outperform baseline methods using state-of-the-art ideas, on synthetic and real-world data, while at the same time exhibiting different and complementary behavior, depending on the scenarios in which they are deployed.
Alexandra Iacob, Bogdan Cautis, Silviu Maniu
SDM1