Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maximilian Kertel
dblp:311/5157
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Boosting Causal Additive Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Boosting Causal Additive Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal ordering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Boosting Causal Additive Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient boosting · 0.9component-wise gradient descent · 0.9boosting · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Boosting Causal Additive ModelsabstractWe present a boosting-based method to learn additive Structural Equation Models (SEMs) from observational data, with a focus on the theoretical aspects of determining the causal order among variables. We introduce a family of score functions based on arbitrary regression techniques, for which we establish sufficient conditions that guarantee consistent identification of the true causal ordering. Our analysis reveals that boosting with early stopping meets these criteria and thus offers a consistent score function for causal orderings. To address the challenges posed by high-dimensional data sets, we adapt our approach through a component-wise gradient descent in the space of additive SEMs. Our simulation study supports the theoretical findings in low-dimensional settings and demonstrates that our high-dimensional adaptation is competitive with state-of-the-art methods. In addition, it exhibits robustness with respect to the choice of hyperparameters, thereby simplifying the tuning process. Maximilian Kertel, Nadja Klein |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2023 | Interactive and Intelligent Root Cause Analysis in Manufacturing with Causal Bayesian Networks and Knowledge GraphsabstractRoot Cause Analysis (RCA) in the manufacturing of electric vehicles is the process of identifying fault causes. Traditionally, the RCA is conducted manually, relying on process expert knowledge. Meanwhile, sensor networks collect significant amounts of data in the manufacturing process. Using this data for RCA makes it more efficient. However, purely data-driven methods like Causal Bayesian Networks have problems scaling to large-scale, real-world manufacturing processes due to the vast amount of potential cause-effect relationships (CER’s). Furthermore, purely data-driven methods have the potential to leave out already known CER’s or to learn spurious CER’s. The paper contributes by proposing an interactive and intelligent RCA tool that combines expert knowledge of an electric vehicle manufacturing process and a data-driven machine learning method. It uses reasoning over a large-scale Knowledge Graph of the manufacturing process while learning a Causal Bayesian Network. In addition, an Interactive User Interface enables a process expert to give feedback to the root cause graph by adding and removing information to the Knowledge Graph. The interactive and intelligent RCA tool reduces the learning time of the Causal Bayesian Network while decreasing the number of spurious CER’s. Thus, the interactive and intelligent RCA tool closes the feedback loop between expert and machine learning method. Christoph Wehner, Maximilian Kertel, Judith Wewerka |
VTC2023-Spring | 2 |