Eva Yezerets

dblp:311/5702 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
dictionary learning
0.812024
Decomposed Linear Dynamical Systems (dLDS) for learning the latent components of neural dynamics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
dynamical system
0.812024
Decomposed Linear Dynamical Systems (dLDS) for learning the latent components of neural dynamics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.812024
Decomposed Linear Dynamical Systems (dLDS) for learning the latent components of neural dynamics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.812024
Decomposed Linear Dynamical Systems (dLDS) for learning the latent components of neural dynamics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse vector tracking · 0.8dictionary learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Decomposed Linear Dynamical Systems (dLDS) for learning the latent components of neural dynamics
abstract
Learning interpretable representations of neural dynamics at a population level is a crucial first step to understanding how observed neural activity relates to perception and behavior. Models of neural dynamics often focus on either low-dimensional projections of neural activity or on learning dynamical systems that explicitly relate to the neural state over time. We discuss how these two approaches are interrelated by considering dynamical systems as representative of flows on a low-dimensional manifold. Building on this concept, we propose a new decomposed dynamical system model that represents complex non-stationary and nonlinear dynamics of time series data as a sparse combination of simpler, more interpretable components. Our model is trained through a dictionary learning procedure, where we leverage recent results in tracking sparse vectors over time. The decomposed nature of the dynamics is more expressive than previous switched approaches for a given number of parameters and enables modeling of overlapping and non-stationary dynamics. In both continuous-time and discrete-time instructional examples, we demonstrate that our model effectively approximates the original system, learns efficient representations, and captures smooth transitions between dynamical modes. Furthermore, we highlight our model’s ability to efficiently capture and demix population dynamics generated from multiple independent subnetworks, a task that is computationally impractical for switched models. Finally, we apply our model to neural “full brain” recordings of C. elegans data, illustrating a diversity of dynamics that is obscured when classified into discrete states.
Noga Mudrik, Yenho Chen, Eva Yezerets, Christopher J. Rozell, Adam S. Charles
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3