VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xindi Guo
dblp:311/6186
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Attend to Fragments: How Key Information Affects Large Language Models for Factual Inconsistency Detection · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Attend to Fragments: How Key Information Affects Large Language Models for Factual Inconsistency Detection · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Attend to Fragments: How Key Information Affects Large Language Models for Factual Inconsistency Detection · SIGIR 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
token-based permutation · 2.0natural language inference · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Attend to Fragments: How Key Information Affects Large Language Models for Factual Inconsistency DetectionabstractAs large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, a key challenge remains their tendency to hallucinate, generating fluent yet inconsistent content that lacks factual grounding. Natural language inference (NLI)-based methods, which determine whether one statement can be logically inferred from another, are widely considered the most effective for detecting input-output inconsistencies in LLMs. However, several fundamental questions, such as whether LLMs can identify relevant information to make correct factual inconsistency detections and how different arrangements of the source document affect reasoning, are not discussed in prior studies. To bridge this research gap, we design a new benchmark, KIFI, which comprises 1032 carefully selected instances from the TRUE and ScreenEval datasets, with key information annotated. Using KIFI, we show that LLMs frequently fail to use the appropriate information to make correct decisions. In addition, we find that LLMs tend to make predictions by overemphasizing certain keywords or fragments, a new phenomenon we term "Attend to Fragments". We further introduce a novel token-based permutation method to identify untrustworthy inconsistencies. Experiments show that filtering out these instances improves the overall correlation by 1.3% on the standard TRUE benchmark. The project is available at https://github.com/VibeHPC/attend-to-fragments Xindi Guo, Patrick H. Chen |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2021 | Crowdsourced identification of multi-target kinase inhibitors for RET- and TAU- based disease: The Multi-Targeting Drug DREAM ChallengeabstractA continuing challenge in modern medicine is the identification of safer and more efficacious drugs. Precision therapeutics, which have one molecular target, have been long promised to be safer and more effective than traditional therapies. This approach has proven to be challenging for multiple reasons including lack of efficacy, rapidly acquired drug resistance, and narrow patient eligibility criteria. An alternative approach is the development of drugs that address the overall disease network by targeting multiple biological targets ('polypharmacology'). Rational development of these molecules will require improved methods for predicting single chemical structures that target multiple drug targets. To address this need, we developed the Multi-Targeting Drug DREAM Challenge, in which we challenged participants to predict single chemical entities that target pro-targets but avoid anti-targets for two unrelated diseases: RET-based tumors and a common form of inherited Tauopathy. Here, we report the results of this DREAM Challenge and the development of two neural network-based machine learning approaches that were applied to the challenge of rational polypharmacology. Together, these platforms provide a potentially useful first step towards developing lead therapeutic compounds that address disease complexity through rational polypharmacology. Zhaoping Xiong, Minji Jeon, Robert J. Allaway, Jaewoo Kang, Donghyeon Park, Jinhyuk Lee, Hwisang Jeon, Miyoung Ko, Hualiang Jiang, Mingyue Zheng, Aik Choon Tan, Xindi Guo, Kristen K. Dang, Alexander Tropsha, Chana Hecht, Tirtha K. Das, Heather A. Carlson, Ruben Abagyan, Justin Guinney, Avner Schlessinger, Ross L. Cagan |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 12 |