Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Hrusa

dblp:311/7740 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
perceptual evaluation
0.512021
ICTree: automatic perceptual metrics for tree models · ACM Trans. Graph. 2021
Visualization and visual analytics › perception
perceptual metrics
0.512021
ICTree: automatic perceptual metrics for tree models · ACM Trans. Graph. 2021
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
user study
0.512021
ICTree: automatic perceptual metrics for tree models · ACM Trans. Graph. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.5neural network predictors · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 ICTree: automatic perceptual metrics for tree models
abstract
Many algorithms for virtual tree generation exist, but the visual realism of the 3D models is unknown. This problem is usually addressed by performing limited user studies or by a side-by-side visual comparison. We introduce an automated system for realism assessment of the tree model based on their perception. We conducted a user study in which 4,000 participants compared over one million pairs of images to collect subjective perceptual scores of a large dataset of virtual trees. The scores were used to train two neural-network-based predictors. A view independent ICTreeF uses the tree model's geometric features that are easy to extract from any model. The second is ICTreeI that estimates the perceived visual realism of a tree from its image. Moreover, to provide an insight into the problem, we deduce intrinsic attributes and evaluate which features make trees look like real trees. In particular, we show that branching angles, length of branches, and widths are critical for perceived realism. We also provide three datasets: carefully curated 3D tree geometries and tree skeletons with their perceptual scores, multiple views of the tree geometries with their scores, and a large dataset of images with scores suitable for training deep neural networks.
Tomas Polasek, David Hrusa, Bedrich Benes, Martin Cadík
ACM Trans. Graph.2