Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luka Dojcilovic

dblp:311/8887 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
mobile application testing
0.512021
UI Test Migration Across Mobile Platforms · ASE 2021
Software testing
test oracle
0.512021
UI Test Migration Across Mobile Platforms · ASE 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

natural language processing · 0.5computer vision · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 UI Test Migration Across Mobile Platforms
abstract
Writing UI tests manually requires significant effort. Several approaches have tried to address this problem in mobile apps: by exploiting the similarities of different apps within the same domain on a single platform, they have shown that it is possible to transfer tests that exercise similar functionality between the apps. A related recent technique enables transfer of UI tests uni-directionally, from an open-source iOS app to the same app implemented for Android. This paper presents MAPIT, a technique that expands existing work in three important ways: (1) it enables bi-directional UI test transfer between pairs of "sibling" Android and iOS apps; (2) it does not assume that the apps’ source code is available; (3) it is capable of transferring tests containing oracles in addition to UI events. MAPIT runs existing tests on a "source" app and builds a partial model of the app corresponding to each test. The model comprises the app’s screenshots, obtainable properties of each screenshot’s constituent elements, and labeled transitions between the screenshots. MAPIT uses this model to determine the corresponding information on the "target" app and generates an equivalent test, via a novel approach that leverages computer vision and NLP. Our evaluation on a diverse set of widely used, closed-source sibling Android and iOS apps shows that MAPIT is feasible, accurate, and useful in transferring UI tests across platforms.
Saghar Talebipour, Yixue Zhao, Luka Dojcilovic, Chenggang Li, Nenad Medvidovic
ASE3