Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alissa M. Hummer
dblp:312/1869
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-3023-2588ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Kernel-Based Evaluation of Conditional Biological Sequence Models · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
antibody engineering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
antibody humanization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
protein sequence classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum mean discrepancy · 1.5kernel methods · 1.5hypothesis testing · 1.5repertoire data · 0.5machine learning classifier · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Kernel-Based Evaluation of Conditional Biological Sequence ModelsabstractWe propose a set of kernel-based tools to evaluate the designs and tune the hyperparameters of conditional sequence models, with a focus on problems in computational biology. The backbone of our tools is a new measure of discrepancy between the true conditional distribution and the model's estimate, called the Augmented Conditional Maximum Mean Discrepancy (ACMMD). Provided that the model can be sampled from, the ACMMD can be estimated unbiasedly from data to quantify absolute model fit, integrated within hypothesis tests, and used to evaluate model reliability. We demonstrate the utility of our approach by analyzing a popular protein design model, ProteinMPNN. We are able to reject the hypothesis that ProteinMPNN fits its data for various protein families, and tune the model's temperature hyperparameter to achieve a better fit. Pierre Glaser, Steffanie Paul, Alissa M. Hummer, Charlotte M. Deane, Debora S. Marks, Alan Nawzad Amin |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire dataabstractMOTIVATION: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics are often produced from non-human sources (typically murine), and can therefore generate immunogenic responses in humans. Humanization procedures aim to produce antibody therapeutics that do not elicit an immune response and are safe for human use, without impacting efficacy. Humanization is normally carried out in a largely trial-and-error experimental process. We have built machine learning classifiers that can discriminate between human and non-human antibody variable domain sequences using the large amount of repertoire data now available. RESULTS: Our classifiers consistently outperform the current best-in-class model for distinguishing human from murine sequences, and our output scores exhibit a negative relationship with the experimental immunogenicity of existing antibody therapeutics. We used our classifiers to develop a novel, computational humanization tool, Hu-mAb, that suggests mutations to an input sequence to reduce its immunogenicity. For a set of therapeutic antibodies with known precursor sequences, the mutations suggested by Hu-mAb show substantial overlap with those deduced experimentally. Hu-mAb is therefore an effective replacement for trial-and-error humanization experiments, producing similar results in a fraction of the time. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Hu-mAb (humanness scoring and humanization) is freely available to use at opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/webapps/humab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Claire Marks, Alissa M. Hummer, Mark Chin, Charlotte M. Deane |
Bioinform. | 2 |