Ranked list truncation aims to cut the ranked results in short considering user-defined objectives, which balances the overall utility and user efforts over retrieval results. The exact selection of an optimal cut-off position brings potential benefits in various real-world applications, such as patent search and legal search. However, there is significant retrieval bias in the ranked list. The result scores and the disorder of document sequences cause difficulties in judging the relevance between the queries and documents -- alleviating the existing methods' performance improvement. In this work, we investigate the characteristics of retrieval bias on altering truncation and propose a multi-task truncation model, MtCut. It employs two auxiliary tasks to make complementary for the retrieval bias. As a practical evaluation, we explore its performance on two datasets, and the results show that MtCut outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on both F1-score and DCG metrics.

Medication recommendation for chronic diseases based on the complex historical electronic medical records (EMR) is an important and challenging research problem in medical informatics because the medical records are often irregularly sampled and contain many missing data. However, most existing approaches fail to explore the irregular time-series dependencies and ignore the consecutive correlation in dynamic prescription history. To fill this gap, we propose the MEdication Recommendation network on Irregular Time-Series (MERITS), which captures the irregular time-series dependencies with the neural ordinary differential equations (Neural ODE). Meanwhile, it leverages a drug-drug interaction knowledge graph and two learned medication relation graphs to explore the co-occurrence and sequential correlations of the medications. We further propose an attention-based encoder-decoder framework to combine the historical information of patients and medications from EMR. Besides, we collect and annotate a diabetes inpatient medication dataset and demonstrate the effectiveness of MERITS by comparing it with several state-of-the-art methods of medication recommendations.