VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ziao Guo
dblp:312/4575
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 39% Automated reasoning and model checking · 11% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Graph learning · 53% Reinforcement learning · 15% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | ACM-MILP: Adaptive Constraint Modification via Grouping and Selection for Hardness-Preserving MILP Instance Generation · ICML 2024 Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph matching
deep graph matching |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Pygmtools: A Python Graph Matching Toolkit · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Deep Learning of Partial Graph Matching via Differentiable Top-K · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph matching |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Pygmtools: A Python Graph Matching Toolkit · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Deep Learning of Partial Graph Matching via Differentiable Top-K · CVPR 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fractional Langevin Dynamics for Combinatorial Optimization via Polynomial-Time Escape · NeurIPS 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
max-cut |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fractional Langevin Dynamics for Combinatorial Optimization via Polynomial-Time Escape · NeurIPS 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › clique
maximum clique |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fractional Langevin Dynamics for Combinatorial Optimization via Polynomial-Time Escape · NeurIPS 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › independent set
maximum independent set |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fractional Langevin Dynamics for Combinatorial Optimization via Polynomial-Time Escape · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › search control
learning to branch |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning
data generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ACM-MILP: Adaptive Constraint Modification via Grouping and Selection for Hardness-Preserving MILP Instance Generation · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
branch-and-bound |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › SAT solving
branching heuristic |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
constrained optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LinSATNet: The Positive Linear Satisfiability Neural Networks · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph matching
partial graph matching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning of Partial Graph Matching via Differentiable Top-K · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sample augmentation · 1.5probability estimation · 1.5online reinforcement learning · 1.5offline reinforcement learning · 1.5latent space · 1.5imitation learning · 1.5community detection · 1.5levy noise · 0.9langevin dynamics · 0.9fractional langevin dynamics · 0.9graph matching solvers · 0.8sinkhorn algorithm · 0.7optimal transport · 0.7differentiable top-k · 0.7differentiable optimization · 0.7attention · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fractional Langevin Dynamics for Combinatorial Optimization via Polynomial-Time EscapeabstractLangevin Dynamics (LD) and its discrete proposal have been widely applied in the field of Combinatorial Optimization (CO). Both sampling-based and data-driven approaches have benefited significantly from these methods. However, LD's reliance on Gaussian noise limits its ability to escape narrow local optima, requires costly parallel chains, and performs poorly in rugged landscapes or with non-strict constraints. These challenges have impeded the development of more advanced approaches. To address these issues, we introduce Fractional Langevin Dynamics (FLD) for CO, replacing Gaussian noise with $\alpha$-stable L\'evy noise. FLD can escape from local optima more readily via L\'evy flights, and in multiple-peak CO problems with high potential barriers it exhibits a polynomial escape time that outperforms the exponential escape time of LD. Moreover, FLD coincides with LD when $\alpha = 2$, and by tuning $\alpha$ it can be adapted to a wider range of complex scenarios in the CO fields. We provide theoretical proof that our method offers enhanced exploration capabilities and improved convergence. Experimental results on the Maximum Independent Set, Maximum Clique, and Maximum Cut problems demonstrate that incorporating FLD advances both sampling-based and data-driven approaches, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in most of the experiments. Shiyue Wang, Ziao Guo, Changhong Lu, Junchi Yan |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation ApproachabstractBranch-and-bound (B\&B) has long been favored for tackling complex Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) problems, where the choice of branching strategy plays a pivotal role. Recently, Imitation Learning (IL)-based policies have emerged as potent alternatives to traditional rule-based approaches. However, it is nontrivial to acquire high-quality training samples, and IL often converges to suboptimal variable choices for branching, restricting the overall performance. In response to these challenges, we propose a novel hybrid online and offline reinforcement learning (RL) approach to enhance the branching policy by cost-effective training sample augmentation. In the online phase, we train an online RL agent to dynamically decide the sample generation processes, drawing from either the learning-based policy or the expert policy. The objective is to strike a balance between exploration and exploitation of the sample generation process. In the offline phase, a value function is trained to fit each decision's cumulative reward and filter the samples with high cumulative returns. This dual-purpose function not only reduces training complexity but also enhances the quality of the samples. To assess the efficacy of our data augmentation mechanism, we conduct comprehensive evaluations across a range of MIP problems. The results consistently show that it excels in making superior branching decisions compared to state-of-the-art learning-based models and the open-source solver SCIP. Notably, it even often outperforms Gurobi. Changwen Zhang, Wenli Ouyang, Hao Yuan 0002, Liming Gong, Ziao Guo, Zhichen Dong, Junchi Yan |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2024 | ACM-MILP: Adaptive Constraint Modification via Grouping and Selection for Hardness-Preserving MILP Instance GenerationabstractData plays a pivotal role in the development of both classic and learning-based methods for Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP). However, the scarcity of data in real-world applications underscores the necessity for MILP instance generation methods. Currently, these methods primarily rely on iterating random single-constraint modifications, disregarding the underlying problem structure with constraint interrelations, thereby leading to compromised quality and solvability. In this paper, we propose ACM-MILP, a framework for MILP instance generation, to achieve adaptive constraint modification and constraint interrelation modeling. It employs an adaptive constraint selection mechanism based on probability estimation within the latent space to preserve instance characteristics. Meanwhile, it detects and groups strongly related constraints through community detection, enabling collective modifications that account for constraint dependencies. Experimental results show significant improvements in problem-solving hardness similarity under our framework. Additionally, in the downstream task, we showcase the efficacy of our generated instances for hyperparameter tuning. Source code is available: https://github.com/Thinklab-SJTU/ACM-MILP. Ziao Guo, Yang Li 0197, Chang Liu 0021, Wenli Ouyang, Junchi Yan |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Pygmtools: A Python Graph Matching ToolkitabstractGraph matching aims to find node-to-node matching among multiple graphs, which is a fundamental yet challenging problem. To facilitate graph matching in scientific research and industrial applications, pygmtools is released, which is a Python graph matching toolkit that implements a comprehensive collection of two-graph matching and multi-graph matching solvers, covering both learning-free solvers as well as learning-based neural graph matching solvers. Our implementation supports numerical backends including Numpy, PyTorch, Jittor, Paddle, runs on Windows, MacOS and Linux, and is friendly to install and configure. Comprehensive documentations covering beginner's guide, API reference and examples are available online. pygmtools is open-sourced under Mulan PSL v2 license. Runzhong Wang, Ziao Guo, Wenzheng Pan, Jiale Ma, Longxuan Wei, Hanxue Zhang, Chang Liu 0021, Zetian Jiang, Xiaokang Yang 0001, Junchi Yan |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | Deep Learning of Partial Graph Matching via Differentiable Top-KabstractGraph matching (GM) aims at discovering node matching between graphs, by maximizing the node-and edgewise affinities between the matched elements. As an NP-hard problem, its challenge is further pronounced in the existence of outlier nodes in both graphs which is ubiquitous in practice, especially for vision problems. However, popular affinity-maximization-based paradigms often lack a principled scheme to suppress the false matching and resort to handcrafted thresholding to dismiss the outliers. This limitation is also inherited by the neural GM solvers though they have shown superior performance in the ideal no-outlier setting. In this paper, we propose to formulate the partial GM problem as the top-k selection task with a given/estimated number of inliers k. Specifically, we devise a differentiable top-k module that enables effective gradient descent over the optimal-transport layer, which can be readily plugged into SOTA deep GM pipelines including the quadratic matching network NGMv2 as well as the linear matching network GCAN. Meanwhile, the attention-fused aggregation layers are developed to estimate k to enable automatic outlier-robust matching in the wild. Last but not least, we remake and release a new benchmark called IMC-PT-SparseGM, originating from the IMC-PT stereomatching dataset. The new benchmark involves more scale-varying graphs and partial matching instances from the real world. Experiments show that our methods outperform other partial matching schemes on popular benchmarks. Runzhong Wang, Ziao Guo, Shaofei Jiang, Xiaokang Yang 0001, Junchi Yan |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2023 | LinSATNet: The Positive Linear Satisfiability Neural NetworksabstractEncoding constraints into neural networks is attractive. This paper studies how to introduce the popular positive linear satisfiability to neural networks. We propose the first differentiable satisfiability layer based on an extension of the classic Sinkhorn algorithm for jointly encoding multiple sets of marginal distributions. We further theoretically characterize the convergence property of the Sinkhorn algorithm for multiple marginals, and the underlying formulation is also derived. In contrast to the sequential decision e.g. reinforcement learning-based solvers, we showcase our technique in solving constrained (specifically satisfiability) problems by one-shot neural networks, including i) a neural routing solver learned without supervision of optimal solutions; ii) a partial graph matching network handling graphs with unmatchable outliers on both sides; iii) a predictive network for financial portfolios with continuous constraints. To our knowledge, there exists no one-shot neural solver for these scenarios when they are formulated as satisfiability problems. Source code is available at https://github.com/Thinklab-SJTU/LinSATNet. Runzhong Wang, Ziao Guo, Xiaokang Yang 0001, Junchi Yan |
ICML | 3 |