Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fabian Altekrüger

dblp:312/5944 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9628-4735ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 39% Optimization for machine learning · 36% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient flow
wasserstein gradient flow
1.422024
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel · ICLR 2024
Neural Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Discrepancies with Riesz Kernels · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model
0.812024
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation
0.812024
Generative Sliced MMD Flows with Riesz Kernels · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.812024
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient flow
0.712023
Neural Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Discrepancies with Riesz Kernels · ICML 2023
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem
0.212024
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein gradient flow · 1.5negative distance kernel · 1.5maximum mean discrepancy · 1.5neural network · 1.4riesz kernels · 0.8MMD flows · 0.8jordan-kinderlehrer-otto scheme · 0.7generative neural network · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel
abstract
We propose conditional flows of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) with the negative distance kernel for posterior sampling and conditional generative modelling. This MMD, which is also known as energy distance, has several advantageous properties like efficient computation via slicing and sorting. We approximate the joint distribution of the ground truth and the observations using discrete Wasserstein gradient flows and establish an error bound for the posterior distributions. Further, we prove that our particle flow is indeed a Wasserstein gradient flow of an appropriate functional. The power of our method is demonstrated by numerical examples including conditional image generation and inverse problems like superresolution, inpainting and computed tomography in low-dose and limited-angle settings.
Paul Hagemann, Johannes Hertrich, Fabian Altekrüger, Robert Beinert, Jannis Chemseddine, Gabriele Steidl
ICLR3
2024 Generative Sliced MMD Flows with Riesz Kernels
abstract
Maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) flows suffer from high computational costs in large scale computations. In this paper, we show that MMD flows with Riesz kernels $K(x,y) = - \|x-y\|^r$, $r \in (0,2)$ have exceptional properties which allow their efficient computation. We prove that the MMD of Riesz kernels, which is also known as energy distance, coincides with the MMD of their sliced version. As a consequence, the computation of gradients of MMDs can be performed in the one-dimensional setting. Here, for $r=1$, a simple sorting algorithm can be applied to reduce the complexity from $O(MN+N^2)$ to $O((M+N)\log(M+N))$ for two measures with $M$ and $N$ support points. As another interesting follow-up result, the MMD of compactly supported measures can be estimated from above and below by the Wasserstein-1 distance. For the implementations we approximate the gradient of the sliced MMD by using only a finite number $P$ of slices. We show that the resulting error has complexity \smash{$O(\sqrt{d/P})$}, where $d$ is the data dimension. These results enable us to train generative models by approximating MMD gradient flows by neural networks even for image applications. We demonstrate the efficiency of our model by image generation on MNIST, FashionMNIST and CIFAR10.
Johannes Hertrich, Christian Wald, Fabian Altekrüger, Paul Hagemann
ICLR3
2023 Neural Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Discrepancies with Riesz Kernels
abstract
Wasserstein gradient flows of maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) functionals with non-smooth Riesz kernels show a rich structure as singular measures can become absolutely continuous ones and conversely. In this paper we contribute to the understanding of such flows. We propose to approximate the backward scheme of Jordan, Kinderlehrer and Otto for computing such Wasserstein gradient flows as well as a forward scheme for so-called Wasserstein steepest descent flows by neural networks (NNs). Since we cannot restrict ourselves to absolutely continuous measures, we have to deal with transport plans and velocity plans instead of usual transport maps and velocity fields. Indeed, we approximate the disintegration of both plans by generative NNs which are learned with respect to appropriate loss functions. In order to evaluate the quality of both neural schemes, we benchmark them on the interaction energy. Here we provide analytic formulas for Wasserstein schemes starting at a Dirac measure and show their convergence as the time step size tends to zero. Finally, we illustrate our neural MMD flows by numerical examples.
Fabian Altekrüger, Johannes Hertrich, Gabriele Steidl
ICML1
2023 WPPNets and WPPFlows: The Power of Wasserstein Patch Priors for Superresolution
abstract
Abstract. Exploiting image patches instead of whole images has proved to be a powerful approach to tackling various problems in image processing. Recently, Wasserstein patch priors (WPPs), which are based on the comparison of the patch distributions of the unknown image and a reference image, were successfully used as data-driven regularizers in the variational formulation of superresolution. However, for each input image, this approach requires the solution of a nonconvex minimization problem which is computationally costly. In this paper, we propose to learn two kinds of neural networks in an unsupervised way based on WPP loss functions. First, we show how convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be incorporated. Once the network, called WPPNet, is learned, it can be very efficiently applied to any input image. Second, we incorporate conditional normalizing flows to provide a tool for uncertainty quantification. Numerical examples demonstrate the very good performance of WPPNets for superresolution in various image classes, even if the forward operator is known only approximately.
Fabian Altekrüger, Johannes Hertrich
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.1
2023 Learning Regularization Parameter-Maps for Variational Image Reconstruction Using Deep Neural Networks and Algorithm Unrolling
abstract
Abstract. We introduce a method for the fast estimation of data-adapted, spatially and temporally dependent regularization parameter-maps for variational image reconstruction, focusing on total variation (TV) minimization. The proposed approach is inspired by recent developments in algorithm unrolling using deep neural networks (NNs) and relies on two distinct subnetworks. The first subnetwork estimates the regularization parameter-map from the input data. The second subnetwork unrolls [Formula: see text] iterations of an iterative algorithm which approximately solves the corresponding TV-minimization problem incorporating the previously estimated regularization parameter-map. The overall network is then trained end-to-end in a supervised learning fashion using pairs of clean and corrupted data but crucially without the need for access to labels for the optimal regularization parameter-maps. We first prove consistency of the unrolled scheme by showing that the unrolled minimizing energy functional used for the supervised learning [Formula: see text]-converges, as [Formula: see text] tends to infinity, to the corresponding functional that incorporates the exact solution map of the TV-minimization problem. Then, we apply and evaluate the proposed method on a variety of large-scale and dynamic imaging problems with retrospectively simulated measurement data for which the automatic computation of such regularization parameters has been so far challenging using the state-of-the-art methods: a 2D dynamic cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction problem, a quantitative brain MRI reconstruction problem, a low-dose computed tomography problem, and a dynamic image denoising problem. The proposed method consistently improves the TV reconstructions using scalar regularization parameters, and the obtained regularization parameter-maps adapt well to imaging problems and data by leading to the preservation of detailed features. Although the choice of the regularization parameter-maps is data-driven and based on NNs, the subsequent reconstruction algorithm is interpretable since it inherits the properties (e.g., convergence guarantees) of the iterative reconstruction method from which the network is implicitly defined.
Andreas Kofler, Fabian Altekrüger, Fatima Antarou Ba, Christoph Kolbitsch, Evangelos Papoutsellis, David Schote, Clemens Sirotenko, Felix F. Zimmermann, Kostas Papafitsoros
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.2