Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aman Tiwari

dblp:312/6746 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 41% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% Reinforcement learning · 20%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
reasoning benchmark
1.012026
DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMs · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
reasoning model
1.012026
DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMs · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMs · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
large-batch training
0.812024
Normalization Layer Per-Example Gradients are Sufficient to Predict Gradient Noise Scale in Transformers · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.712023
trlX: A Framework for Large Scale Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.712023
trlX: A Framework for Large Scale Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback › learning from human feedback
RLHF
0.712023
trlX: A Framework for Large Scale Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback · EMNLP 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test-time scaling · 1.0per-example gradient norms · 0.8layernorm backward pass · 0.8custom kernel · 0.8reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.7distributed training · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMs
abstract
Test-time scaling has significantly improved large language model (LLM) performance, enabling deeper reasoning to solve complex problems. However, this increased reasoning capability also leads to excessive token generation and unnecessary problem-solving attempts. We introduce "Don't Reason Bench (DNR Bench)", a new benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs’ ability to robustly understand tricky reasoning triggers and avoid unnecessary generation. DNR Bench consists of 150 adversarially designed prompts that are easy for humans to understand and respond to, but surprisingly not for many recent prominent LLMs. DNR Bench tests models' abilities across different capabilities, such as instruction adherence, hallucination avoidance, redundancy filtering, and unanswerable question recognition. We evaluate reasoning LLMs (RLMs), including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI O3-mini, and Claude-3.7-sonnet, and compare them against a powerful non-reasoning model, such as GPT-4o. Our experiments reveal that RLMs generate up to 70x more tokens than necessary, often failing at tasks that simpler non-reasoning models handle efficiently with higher accuracy. Our findings underscore the need for more effective training and inference strategies in RLMs.
Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Masoud Hashemi, Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan, Jishnu Sethumadhavan Nair, Aman Tiwari, Vikas Yadav
AAAI5
2024 Normalization Layer Per-Example Gradients are Sufficient to Predict Gradient Noise Scale in Transformers
abstract
Per-example gradient norms are a vital ingredient for estimating gradient noise scale (GNS) with minimal variance. Observing the tensor contractions required to compute them, we propose a method with minimal FLOPs in 3D or greater tensor regimes by simultaneously computing the norms while computing the parameter gradients. Using this method we are able to observe the GNS of different layers at higher accuracy than previously possible. We find that the total GNS of contemporary transformer models is predicted well by the GNS of only the normalization layers. As a result, focusing only on the normalization layer, we develop a custom kernel to compute the per-example gradient norms while performing the LayerNorm backward pass with zero throughput overhead. Tracking GNS on only those layers, we are able to guide a practical batch size schedule that reduces training time by 18% on a Chinchilla-optimal language model.
Gavia Gray, Aman Tiwari, Shane Bergsma, Joel Hestness
NeurIPS2
2023 trlX: A Framework for Large Scale Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
abstract
Alexander Havrilla, Maksym Zhuravinskyi, Duy Phung, Aman Tiwari, Jonathan Tow, Stella Biderman, Quentin Anthony, Louis Castricato. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.
Alexander Havrilla, Maksym Zhuravinskyi, Duy Phung, Aman Tiwari, Jonathan Tow, Stella Biderman, Quentin Anthony, Louis Castricato
EMNLP4
2022 Corpus for Automatic Structuring of Legal Documents
abstract
In populous countries, pending legal cases have been growing exponentially. There is a need for developing techniques for processing and organizing legal documents. In this paper, we introduce a new corpus for structuring legal documents. In particular, we introduce a corpus of legal judgment documents in English that are segmented into topical and coherent parts. Each of these parts is annotated with a label coming from a list of pre-defined Rhetorical Roles. We develop baseline models for automatically predicting rhetorical roles in a legal document based on the annotated corpus. Further, we show the application of rhetorical roles to improve performance on the tasks of summarization and legal judgment prediction. We release the corpus and baseline model code along with the paper.
Prathamesh Kalamkar, Aman Tiwari, Astha Agarwal, Saurabh Karn, Smita Gupta, Vivek Raghavan, Ashutosh Modi
LREC2