VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ilya Kaufman
dblp:312/7143
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 38% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 38% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Curvature Enhanced Data Augmentation for Regression · ICML 2025 First-Order Manifold Data Augmentation for Regression Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
data augmentation for regression |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Curvature Enhanced Data Augmentation for Regression · ICML 2025 First-Order Manifold Data Augmentation for Regression Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
manifold-based augmentation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Curvature Enhanced Data Augmentation for Regression · ICML 2025 First-Order Manifold Data Augmentation for Regression Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Curvature Enhanced Data Augmentation for Regression · ICML 2025 First-Order Manifold Data Augmentation for Regression Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Data Representations' Study of Latent Image Manifolds · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › representation geometry
latent space geometry |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Data Representations' Study of Latent Image Manifolds · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Data Representations' Study of Latent Image Manifolds · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Data Representations' Study of Latent Image Manifolds · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
second-order manifold approximation · 0.9curvature-enhanced sampling · 0.9tangent plane sampling · 0.8mixup · 0.8intrinsic dimension estimation · 0.7curvature analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Curvature Enhanced Data Augmentation for RegressionabstractDeep learning models with a large number of parameters, often referred to as over-parameterized models, have achieved exceptional performance across various tasks. Despite concerns about overfitting, these models frequently generalize well to unseen data, thanks to effective regularization techniques, with data augmentation being among the most widely used. While data augmentation has shown great success in classification tasks using label-preserving transformations, its application in regression problems has received less attention. Recently, a novel manifold learning approach for generating synthetic data was proposed, utilizing a first-order approximation of the data manifold. Building on this foundation, we present a theoretical framework and practical tools for approximating and sampling general data manifolds. Furthermore, we introduce the Curvature-Enhanced Manifold Sampling (CEMS) method for regression tasks. CEMS leverages a second-order representation of the data manifold to enable efficient sampling and reconstruction of new data points. Extensive evaluations across multiple datasets and comparisons with state-of-the-art methods demonstrate that CEMS delivers superior performance in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution scenarios, while introducing only minimal computational overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/azencot-group/CEMS. Ilya Kaufman, Omri Azencot |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | First-Order Manifold Data Augmentation for Regression LearningabstractData augmentation (DA) methods tailored to specific domains generate synthetic samples by applying transformations that are appropriate for the characteristics of the underlying data domain, such as rotations on images and time warping on time series data. In contrast, domain-independent approaches, e.g. mixup, are applicable to various data modalities, and as such they are general and versatile. While regularizing classification tasks via DA is a well-explored research topic, the effect of DA on regression problems received less attention. To bridge this gap, we study the problem of domain-independent augmentation for regression, and we introduce FOMA: a new data-driven domain-independent data augmentation method. Essentially, our approach samples new examples from the tangent planes of the train distribution. Augmenting data in this way aligns with the network tendency towards capturing the dominant features of its input signals. We evaluate FOMA on in-distribution generalization and out-of-distribution robustness benchmarks, and we show that it improves the generalization of several neural architectures. We also find that strong baselines based on mixup are less effective in comparison to our approach. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/azencot-group/FOMA Ilya Kaufman, Omri Azencot |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Data Representations' Study of Latent Image ManifoldsabstractDeep neural networks have been demonstrated to achieve phenomenal success in many domains, and yet their inner mechanisms are not well understood. In this paper, we investigate the curvature of image manifolds, i.e., the manifold deviation from being flat in its principal directions. We find that state-of-the-art trained convolutional neural networks for image classification have a characteristic curvature profile along layers: an initial steep increase, followed by a long phase of a plateau, and followed by another increase. In contrast, this behavior does not appear in untrained networks in which the curvature flattens. We also show that the curvature gap between the last two layers has a strong correlation with the generalization capability of the network. Moreover, we find that the intrinsic dimension of latent codes is not necessarily indicative of curvature. Finally, we observe that common regularization methods such as mixup yield flatter representations when compared to other methods. Our experiments show consistent results over a variety of deep learning architectures and multiple data sets. Ilya Kaufman, Omri Azencot |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Cyclic Diffeomorphic Transformer Nets For Contour AlignmentabstractShape analysis is a key task in image processing. A common method for representing a 2D shape is via a polygon, where the latter is a discretized version of the contour outlining the shape. However, due to the problem of curve reparameterization (i. e., points “sliding” along the contour), even if several shapes are very similar, their representations might be misleadingly far from each other. This misalignment problem confounds shape analysis. As a remedy, we propose a deep-learning framework, based on the recently-proposed diffeomorphic transformers nets. The proposed method handles either a single class (in an unsupervised manner) or multiple classes (in a semi-supervised manner), and is amenable to the warp-around effect exhibited in closed contours. Moreover, unlike typical alignment methods unrelated to learning, the proposed method aligns not only the original (“training”) shapes but also generalizes to test shapes (even if no class labels are given during the test). Our code is publicly available at https://git;hub.com/BGU-CS-VIL/CDTNCA. Ilya Kaufman, Ron Shapira Weber, Oren Freifeld |
ICIP | 1 |