Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rosni Vasu

dblp:313/4078 · also Rosni K. Vasu · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0302-5065ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 86% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
HypER: Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with Provenance · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
scientific hypothesis generation
0.912025
HypER: Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with Provenance · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation
0.712023
Med-EASi: Finely Annotated Dataset and Models for Controllable Simplification of Medical Texts · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.712023
Med-EASi: Finely Annotated Dataset and Models for Controllable Simplification of Medical Texts · AAAI 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text simplification
medical text simplification
0.712023
Med-EASi: Finely Annotated Dataset and Models for Controllable Simplification of Medical Texts · AAAI 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text simplification
0.712023
Med-EASi: Finely Annotated Dataset and Models for Controllable Simplification of Medical Texts · AAAI 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › reasoning verification
reasoning chain verification
0.312025
HypER: Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with Provenance · EMNLP 2025
Medical and health informatics › public health
health literacy
0.212023
Med-EASi: Finely Annotated Dataset and Models for Controllable Simplification of Medical Texts · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

t5-large · 1.3position-aware training · 1.3position-agnostic training · 1.3small language model · 0.9retrieval augmentation · 0.9multi-task learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 HypER: Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with Provenance
abstract
Large Language models have demonstrated promising performance in research ideation across scientific domains.Hypothesis development, the process of generating a highly specific declarative statement connecting a research idea with empirical validation, has received relatively less attention.Existing approaches trivially deploy retrieval augmentation and focus only on the quality of the final output ignoring the underlying reasoning process behind ideation.We present HypER (Hypothesis Generation with Explanation and Reasoning), a small language model (SLM) trained for literature-guided reasoning and evidence-based hypothesis generation.HypER is trained in a multi-task setting to discriminate between valid and invalid scientific reasoning chains in presence of controlled distractions.We find that HypER outperforms the base model, distinguishing valid from invalid reasoning chains (+22% average absolute F1), generates better evidence-grounded hypotheses (0.327 vs. 0.305 base model) with high feasibility and impact as judged by human experts (>3.5 on 5-point Likert scale).Resource at . Example of a valid reasoning chainTitle: Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization Abstract: This study evaluated the effectiveness (changes in health behaviors, health status, and health service utilization) of a self-management program for chronic disease ...
Rosni Vasu, Chandrayee Basu, Bhavana Dalvi, Cristina Sarasua, Peter Clark, Abraham Bernstein
EMNLP1
2024 SciHyp: A Fine-Grained Dataset Describing Hypotheses and Their Components from Scientific Articles
Rosni Vasu, Cristina Sarasua, Abraham Bernstein
ISWC (3)1
2023 Med-EASi: Finely Annotated Dataset and Models for Controllable Simplification of Medical Texts
abstract
Automatic medical text simplification can assist providers with patient-friendly communication and make medical texts more accessible, thereby improving health literacy. But curating a quality corpus for this task requires the supervision of medical experts. In this work, we present Med-EASi (Medical dataset for Elaborative and Abstractive Simplification), a uniquely crowdsourced and finely annotated dataset for supervised simplification of short medical texts. Its expert-layman-AI collaborative annotations facilitate controllability over text simplification by marking four kinds of textual transformations: elaboration, replacement, deletion, and insertion. To learn medical text simplification, we fine-tune T5-large with four different styles of input-output combinations, leading to two control-free and two controllable versions of the model. We add two types of controllability into text simplification, by using a multi-angle training approach: position-aware, which uses in-place annotated inputs and outputs, and position-agnostic, where the model only knows the contents to be edited, but not their positions. Our results show that our fine-grained annotations improve learning compared to the unannotated baseline. Furthermore, our position-aware control enhances the model's ability to generate better simplification than the position-agnostic version. The data and code are available at https://github.com/Chandrayee/CTRL-SIMP.
Chandrayee Basu, Rosni Vasu, Michihiro Yasunaga
AAAI2