VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Toon Vanderschueren
dblp:313/9981
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7202-1589ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 62% Optimization for machine learning · 28% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 10% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025 Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
treatment effect estimation |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025 Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
combined algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › heterogeneous treatment effect estimation
conditional average treatment effect |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
covariate shift |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ensembling · 0.9automated machine learning · 0.9neural controlled differential equations · 0.7inverse intensity-weighting · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect EstimationabstractEstimating causal effects is crucial in domains like healthcare, economics, and education. Despite advances in machine learning (ML) for estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE), the practical adoption of these methods remains limited, due to the complexities of implementing, tuning, and validating them. To address these challenges, we formalize the search for an optimal ML pipeline for CATE estimation as a counterfactual Combined Algorithm Selection and Hyperparameter (CASH) optimization. We introduce AutoCATE, the first end-to-end, automated solution for CATE estimation. Unlike prior approaches that address only parts of this problem, AutoCATE integrates evaluation, estimation, and ensembling in a unified framework. AutoCATE enables comprehensive comparisons of different protocols, yielding novel insights into CATE estimation and a final configuration that outperforms commonly used strategies. To facilitate broad adoption and further research, we release AutoCATE as an open-source software package. Toon Vanderschueren, Tim Verdonck, Mihaela van der Schaar, Wouter Verbeke |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | A new perspective on classification: Optimally allocating limited resources to uncertain tasks
Toon Vanderschueren, Bart Baesens, Tim Verdonck, Wouter Verbeke |
Decis. Support Syst. | 1 |
| 2023 | Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over TimeabstractMachine learning (ML) holds great potential for accurately forecasting treatment outcomes over time, which could ultimately enable the adoption of more individualized treatment strategies in many practical applications. However, a significant challenge that has been largely overlooked by the ML literature on this topic is the presence of informative sampling in observational data. When instances are observed irregularly over time, sampling times are typically not random, but rather informative–depending on the instance’s characteristics, past outcomes, and administered treatments. In this work, we formalize informative sampling as a covariate shift problem and show that it can prohibit accurate estimation of treatment outcomes if not properly accounted for. To overcome this challenge, we present a general framework for learning treatment outcomes in the presence of informative sampling using inverse intensity-weighting, and propose a novel method, TESAR-CDE, that instantiates this framework using Neural CDEs. Using a simulation environment based on a clinical use case, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in learning under informative sampling. Toon Vanderschueren, Alicia Curth, Wouter Verbeke, Mihaela van der Schaar |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Predict-then-optimize or predict-and-optimize? An empirical evaluation of cost-sensitive learning strategies
Toon Vanderschueren, Tim Verdonck, Bart Baesens, Wouter Verbeke |
Inf. Sci. | 1 |