Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maryam Qamar

dblp:314/0016 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2027
0000-0003-0774-5411ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 46% Image and video coding · 30% Geometric modeling and processing · 23%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Segmentation and scene understanding · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising
1.012026
I-INR: Iterative Implicit Neural Representations · AAAI 2026
Image and video processing
image reconstruction
1.012026
I-INR: Iterative Implicit Neural Representations · AAAI 2026
Geometric modeling and processing
implicit neural representation
1.012026
I-INR: Iterative Implicit Neural Representations · AAAI 2026
Image and video coding › image compression › learned image compression
entropy model
0.712023
Towards Efficient Image Compression Without Autoregressive Models · NeurIPS 2023
Image and video coding › image compression
learned image compression
0.712023
Towards Efficient Image Compression Without Autoregressive Models · NeurIPS 2023
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding
0.312026
I-INR: Iterative Implicit Neural Representations · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior distribution
hyperprior
0.212023
Towards Efficient Image Compression Without Autoregressive Models · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative refinement · 2.0implicit neural representation · 2.0correlation loss · 1.3checkerboard context model · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2027 Pseudo-image spatiotemporal augmentation for cellular network traffic prediction
Maryam Qamar, Tahir Khalil, Md. Atikuzzaman, Chaoning Zhang, Sung-Ho Bae
Expert Syst. Appl.1
2026 I-INR: Iterative Implicit Neural Representations
abstract
Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) have revolutionized signal processing and computer vision by modeling signals as continuous, differentiable functions parameterized by neural networks. However, INRs are prone to the spectral bias problem, limiting their ability to retain high-frequency information, and often struggle with noise robustness. Motivated by recent trends in iterative refinement processes, we propose Iterative Implicit Neural Representations (I-INRs). This novel plug-and-play framework iteratively refines signal reconstructions to restore high-frequency details, improve noise robustness, and enhance generalization, ultimately delivering superior reconstruction quality. I-INRs integrate seamlessly into existing INR architectures with only a 0.5–2% increase in parameters. During reconstruction, the iterative refinement adds just 0.8–1.6% additional FLOPs over the baseline while delivering a substantial performance boost of up to +2.0 PSNR. Extensive experiments demonstrate that I-INRs consistently outperform WIRE, SIREN, and Gauss across various computer vision tasks, including image fitting, image denoising, and object occupancy prediction.
Ali Haider, Muhammad Salman Ali, Maryam Qamar, Tahir Khalil, Soo Ye Kim, Jihyong Oh, Enzo Tartaglione, Sung-Ho Bae
AAAI3
2026 Efficient dataset condensation with learnable color representation and subset matching
Linh-Tam Tran, Quang Hieu Vo, Maryam Qamar, Chaoning Zhang, Hui Yong Kim, Sung-Ho Bae
Knowl. Based Syst.3
2024 Trimming the Fat: Efficient Compression of 3D Gaussian Splats through Pruning
Muhammad Salman Ali, Maryam Qamar, Sung-Ho Bae, Enzo Tartaglione
BMVC2
2023 Towards Efficient Image Compression Without Autoregressive Models
abstract
Recently, learned image compression (LIC) has garnered increasing interest with its rapidly improving performance surpassing conventional codecs. A key ingredient of LIC is a hyperprior-based entropy model, where the underlying joint probability of the latent image features is modeled as a product of Gaussian distributions from each latent element. Since latents from the actual images are not spatially independent, autoregressive (AR) context based entropy models were proposed to handle the discrepancy between the assumed distribution and the actual distribution. Though the AR-based models have proven effective, the computational complexity is significantly increased due to the inherent sequential nature of the algorithm. In this paper, we present a novel alternative to the AR-based approach that can provide a significantly better trade-off between performance and complexity. To minimize the discrepancy, we introduce a correlation loss that forces the latents to be spatially decorrelated and better fitted to the independent probability model. Our correlation loss is proved to act as a general plug-in for the hyperprior (HP) based learned image compression methods. The performance gain from our correlation loss is ‘free’ in terms of computation complexity for both inference time and decoding time. To our knowledge, our method gives the best trade-off between the complexity and performance: combined with the Checkerboard-CM, it attains **90%** and when combined with ChARM-CM, it attains **98%** of the AR-based BD-Rate gains yet is around **50 times** and **30 times** faster than AR-based methods respectively
Muhammad Salman Ali, Yeongwoong Kim, Maryam Qamar, Sung-Chang Lim, Donghyun Kim 0017, Chaoning Zhang, Sung-Ho Bae, Hui Yong Kim
NeurIPS3