Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christofer Meinecke

dblp:314/2488 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5637-9975ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
Cluster-Based Random Forest Visualization and Interpretation · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics
model visualization
1.012026
Cluster-Based Random Forest Visualization and Interpretation · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics
0.612022
Explaining Semi-Supervised Text Alignment Through Visualization · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 2.0decision tree distance metric · 2.0clustering · 2.0word embedding · 0.6visual interface · 0.6neural network · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Cluster-Based Random Forest Visualization and Interpretation
abstract
Random forests are a machine learning method used to automatically classify datasets and consist of a multitude of decision trees. While these random forests often have higher performance and generalize better than a single decision tree, they are also harder to interpret. This paper presents a visualization method and system to increase interpretability of random forests. We cluster similar trees which enables users to interpret how the model performs in general without needing to analyze each individual decision tree in detail, or interpret an oversimplified summary of the full forest. To meaningfully cluster the decision trees, we introduce a new distance metric that takes into account both the decision rules as well as the predictions of a pair of decision trees. We also propose two new visualization methods that visualize both clustered and individual decision trees: (1) The Feature Plot, which visualizes the topological position of features in the decision trees, and (2) the Rule Plot, which visualizes the decision rules of the decision trees. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through a case study on the "Glass" dataset, which is a relatively complex standard machine learning dataset, as well as a small user study.
Max Sondag, Christofer Meinecke, Dennis Collaris, Tatiana von Landesberger, Stef van den Elzen
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2
2022 Explaining Semi-Supervised Text Alignment Through Visualization
abstract
The analysis of variance in complex text traditions is an arduous task when carried out manually. Text alignment algorithms provide domain experts with a robust alternative to such repetitive tasks. Existing white-box approaches allow the digital humanities to establish syntax-based metrics taking into account the spelling, morphology and order of words. However, they produce limited results, as semantic meanings are typically not taken into account. Our interdisciplinary collaboration between visualization and digital humanities combined a semi-supervised text alignment approach based on word embeddings that take not only syntactic but also semantic text features into account, thereby improving the overall quality of the alignment. In our collaboration, we developed different visual interfaces that communicate the word distribution in high-dimensional vector space generated by the underlying neural network for increased transparency, assessment of the tool's reliability and overall improved hypothesis generation. We further offer visual means to enable the expert reader to feed domain knowledge into the system at multiple levels with the aim of improving both the product and the process of text alignment. This ultimately illustrates how visualization can engage with and augment complex modes of reading in the humanities.
Christofer Meinecke, David Joseph Wrisley, Stefan Jänicke
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1
2020 A Survey on Visualizations for Musical Data
abstract
Abstract Digital methods are increasingly applied to store, structure and analyse vast amounts of musical data. In this context, visualization plays a crucial role, as it assists musicologists and non‐expert users in data analysis and in gaining new knowledge. This survey focuses on this unique link between musicology and visualization. We classify 129 related works according to the visualized data types, and we analyse which visualization techniques were applied for certain research inquiries and to fulfill specific tasks. Next to scientific references, we take commercial music software and public websites into account, that contribute novel concepts of visualizing musicological data. We encounter different aspects of uncertainty as major problems when dealing with musicological data and show how occurring inconsistencies are processed and visually communicated. Drawing from our overview in the field, we identify open challenges for research on the interface of musicology and visualization to be tackled in the future.
Richard Khulusi, Jakob Kusnick, Christofer Meinecke, Christina Gillmann, Josef Focht, Stefan Jänicke
Comput. Graph. Forum3