Accurate identification of protein particles in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) micrographs is crucial for high-resolution structure determination, but remains challenging due to the heavy reliance on extensive annotated datasets and the difficulty of ensuring robustness under low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions. Current approaches require large annotations and exhibit poor generalization to new protein targets. We present CryoFSL (Cryo-EM Few Shot-Learning), a novel few-shot learning framework built on Segment Anything Model 2 with lightweight adapters, enabling robust particle picking with as few as five labeled micrographs and significantly reducing the annotation burden. The framework's hierarchical adapter design supports dynamic feature modulation for low-SNR and heterogeneous conditions, resolving the trade-off between annotation burden and performance. CryoFSL surpasses both traditional template-based methods and state-of-the-art deep learning models across diverse proteins in the few-shot learning setting, achieving superior recall, precision, and 3D reconstruction resolution with minimal supervision. It maintains stability across heterogeneous micrographs and consistently detects high-quality particles with fewer false-positives. Notably, CryoFSL achieves competitive resolution in density map reconstruction with just a fraction of the particles picked by other methods, redefining efficiency and quality in cryo-EM analysis. This work paves the way for scalable, generalizable, and annotation-efficient particle-picking pipelines. The code is available at https://github.com/biplabpoudel25/CryoFSL.

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has revolutionized structural biology by enabling the determination of high-resolution 3-Dimensional (3D) structures of large biological macromolecules. Protein particle picking, the process of identifying individual protein particles in cryo-EM micrographs for building protein structures, has progressed from manual and template-based methods to sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches in recent years. This review critically examines the evolution and current state of cryo-EM particle picking methods, with an emphasis on the impact of AI. We conducted a comparative evaluation of popular AI-based particle picking methods, using both general machine learning metrics and specific cryo-EM structure determination metrics. This analysis involved constructing the 3D density map from the picked protein particles and assessing the obtained resolution and particle orientation diversity, underscoring the significant impact of AI on cryo-EM particle picking. Despite the advancements, we also identified key obstacles, such as handling complex micrographs with small proteins. The analysis provides insights into the future development of more sophisticated and fully automated AI methods in cryo-EM particle recognition.

Picking protein particles in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) micrographs is a crucial step in the cryo-EM-based structure determination. However, existing methods trained on a limited amount of cryo-EM data still cannot accurately pick protein particles from noisy cryo-EM images. The general foundational artificial intelligence-based image segmentation model such as Meta's Segment Anything Model (SAM) cannot segment protein particles well because their training data do not include cryo-EM images. Here, we present a novel approach (CryoSegNet) of integrating an attention-gated U-shape network (U-Net) specially designed and trained for cryo-EM particle picking and the SAM. The U-Net is first trained on a large cryo-EM image dataset and then used to generate input from original cryo-EM images for SAM to make particle pickings. CryoSegNet shows both high precision and recall in segmenting protein particles from cryo-EM micrographs, irrespective of protein type, shape and size. On several independent datasets of various protein types, CryoSegNet outperforms two top machine learning particle pickers crYOLO and Topaz as well as SAM itself. The average resolution of density maps reconstructed from the particles picked by CryoSegNet is 3.33 Å, 7% better than 3.58 Å of Topaz and 14% better than 3.87 Å of crYOLO. It is publicly available at https://github.com/jianlin-cheng/CryoSegNet.

MOTIVATION: Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is a powerful technique for determining the structures of large protein complexes. Picking single protein particles from cryo-EM micrographs (images) is a crucial step in reconstructing protein structures from them. However, the widely used template-based particle picking process requires some manual particle picking and is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Though machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) can potentially automate particle picking, the current AI methods pick particles with low precision or low recall. The erroneously picked particles can severely reduce the quality of reconstructed protein structures, especially for the micrographs with low signal-to-noise ratio. RESULTS: To address these shortcomings, we devised CryoTransformer based on transformers, residual networks, and image processing techniques to accurately pick protein particles from cryo-EM micrographs. CryoTransformer was trained and tested on the largest labeled cryo-EM protein particle dataset-CryoPPP. It outperforms the current state-of-the-art machine learning methods of particle picking in terms of the resolution of 3D density maps reconstructed from the picked particles as well as F1-score, and is poised to facilitate the automation of the cryo-EM protein particle picking. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and data for CryoTransformer are openly available at: https://github.com/jianlin-cheng/CryoTransformer.

New drug production, from target identification to marketing approval, takes over 12 years and can cost around $2.6 billion. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled the urgent need for more powerful computational methods for drug discovery. Here, we review the computational approaches to predicting protein-ligand interactions in the context of drug discovery, focusing on methods using artificial intelligence (AI). We begin with a brief introduction to proteins (targets), ligands (e.g. drugs) and their interactions for nonexperts. Next, we review databases that are commonly used in the domain of protein-ligand interactions. Finally, we survey and analyze the machine learning (ML) approaches implemented to predict protein-ligand binding sites, ligand-binding affinity and binding pose (conformation) including both classical ML algorithms and recent deep learning methods. After exploring the correlation between these three aspects of protein-ligand interaction, it has been proposed that they should be studied in unison. We anticipate that our review will aid exploration and development of more accurate ML-based prediction strategies for studying protein-ligand interactions.