Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antoine Picard-Weibel

dblp:314/5931 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 61% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
model-based optimization
0.812024
Learning via Surrogate PAC-Bayes · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds
0.812024
Learning via Surrogate PAC-Bayes · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC-Bayesian analysis
0.812024
Learning via Surrogate PAC-Bayes · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.212024
Learning via Surrogate PAC-Bayes · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 0.8PAC-Bayes bound optimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning via Surrogate PAC-Bayes
abstract
PAC-Bayes learning is a comprehensive setting for (i) studying the generalisation ability of learning algorithms and (ii) deriving new learning algorithms by optimising a generalisation bound. However, optimising generalisation bounds might not always be viable for tractable or computational reasons, or both. For example, iteratively querying the empirical risk might prove computationally expensive. In response, we introduce a novel principled strategy for building an iterative learning algorithm via the optimisation of a sequence of surrogate training objectives, inherited from PAC-Bayes generalisation bounds. The key argument is to replace the empirical risk (seen as a function of hypotheses) in the generalisation bound by its projection onto a constructible low dimensional functional space: these projections can be queried much more efficiently than the initial risk. On top of providing that generic recipe for learning via surrogate PAC-Bayes bounds, we (i) contribute theoretical results establishing that iteratively optimising our surrogates implies the optimisation of the original generalisation bounds, (ii) instantiate this strategy to the framework of meta-learning, introducing a meta-objective offering a closed form expression for meta-gradient, (iii) illustrate our approach with numerical experiments inspired by an industrial biochemical problem.
Antoine Picard-Weibel, Roman Moscoviz, Benjamin Guedj
NeurIPS1