Alexander Erben

dblp:314/5970 · also Alexander Isenko · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0153-7251ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 68% Deep learning architectures and training · 32%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 77% Cloud and datacenter computing · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.812024
How Can We Train Deep Learning Models Across Clouds and Continents? An Experimental Study · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.812024
A Survey on Efficient Federated Learning Methods for Foundation Model Training · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
foundation model training
0.812024
A Survey on Efficient Federated Learning Methods for Foundation Model Training · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model
0.212024
A Survey on Efficient Federated Learning Methods for Foundation Model Training · IJCAI 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud deployment
hybrid cloud
0.212024
How Can We Train Deep Learning Models Across Clouds and Continents? An Experimental Study · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cost-throughput evaluation · 1.5federated learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Survey on Efficient Federated Learning Methods for Foundation Model Training
Herbert Woisetschlaeger, Alexander Erben, Shiqiang Wang 0001, Ruben Mayer, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
IJCAI2
2024 FLEdge: Benchmarking Federated Learning Applications in Edge Computing Systems
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) has become a viable technique for realizing privacy-enhancing distributed deep learning on the network edge. Heterogeneous hardware, unreliable client devices, and energy constraints often characterize edge computing systems. In this paper, we propose FLEdge, which complements existing FL benchmarks by enabling a systematic evaluation of client capabilities. We focus on computational and communication bottlenecks, client behavior, and data security implications. Our experiments with models varying from 14K to 80M trainable parameters are carried out on dedicated hardware with emulated network characteristics and client behavior. We find that state-of-the-art embedded hardware has significant memory bottlenecks, leading to 4× longer processing times than on modern data center GPUs.
Herbert Woisetschlaeger, Alexander Erben, Ruben Mayer, Shiqiang Wang 0001, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
Middleware2
2024 How Can We Train Deep Learning Models Across Clouds and Continents? An Experimental Study
abstract
This paper aims to answer the question: Can deep learning models be cost-efficiently trained on a global market of spot VMs spanning different data centers and cloud providers? To provide guidance, we extensively evaluate the cost and throughput implications of training in different zones, continents, and clouds for representative CV, NLP and ASR models. To expand the current training options further, we compare the scalability potential for hybrid-cloud scenarios by adding cloud resources to on-premise hardware to improve training throughput. Finally, we show how leveraging spot instance pricing enables a new cost-efficient way to train models with multiple cheap VMs, trumping both more centralized and powerful hardware and even on-demand cloud offerings at competitive prices.
Alexander Erben, Ruben Mayer, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2022 Where Is My Training Bottleneck? Hidden Trade-Offs in Deep Learning Preprocessing Pipelines
abstract
Preprocessing pipelines in deep learning aim to provide sufficient data throughput to keep the training processes busy. Maximizing resource utilization is becoming more challenging as the throughput of training processes increases with hardware innovations (e.g., faster GPUs, TPUs, and inter-connects) and advanced parallelization techniques that yield better scalability. At the same time, the amount of training data needed in order to train increasingly complex models is growing. As a consequence of this development, data preprocessing and provisioning are becoming a severe bottleneck in end-to-end deep learning pipelines.
Alexander Erben, Ruben Mayer, Jeffrey Jedele, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
SIGMOD Conference1