Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Capprin Bass
dblp:314/6271
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-0672-3756ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 79% Legged, aerial and field robots · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › gait control
gait optimization |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Towards Geometric Motion Planning for High-Dimensional Systems: Gait-Based Coordinate Optimization and Local Metrics · ICRA 2024 Characterizing Error in Noncommutative Geometric Gait Analysis · ICRA 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
geometric motion planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Geometric Motion Planning for High-Dimensional Systems: Gait-Based Coordinate Optimization and Local Metrics · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Geometric Motion Planning for High-Dimensional Systems: Gait-Based Coordinate Optimization and Local Metrics · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
robot locomotion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Characterizing Error in Noncommutative Geometric Gait Analysis · ICRA 2022 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
locomotion |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Geometric Motion Planning for High-Dimensional Systems: Gait-Based Coordinate Optimization and Local Metrics · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
nonholonomic systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Geometric Motion Planning for High-Dimensional Systems: Gait-Based Coordinate Optimization and Local Metrics · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
perturbation analysis · 1.1noncommutative geometric analysis · 1.1local metrics · 0.8coordinate optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Towards Geometric Motion Planning for High-Dimensional Systems: Gait-Based Coordinate Optimization and Local MetricsabstractGeometric motion planning offers effective and interpretable gait analysis and optimization tools for locomoting systems. However, due to the curse of dimensionality in coordinate optimization, a key component of geometric motion planning, it is almost infeasible to apply current geometric motion planning to high-dimensional systems. In this paper, we propose a gait-based coordinate optimization method that overcomes the curse of dimensionality. We also identify a unified geometric representation of locomotion by generalizing various nonholonomic constraints into local metrics. By combining these two approaches, we take a step towards geometric motion planning for high-dimensional systems. We test our method in two classes of high-dimensional systems - low Reynolds number swimmers and free-falling Cassie - with up to 11-dimensional shape variables. The resulting optimal gait in the high-dimensional system shows better efficiency compared to that of the reduced-order model. Furthermore, we provide a geometric optimality interpretation of the optimal gait. Yanhao Yang, Capprin Bass, Ross L. Hatton |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2022 | Characterizing Error in Noncommutative Geometric Gait AnalysisabstractA key problem in robotic locomotion is in finding optimal shape changes to effectively displace systems through the world. Variational techniques for gait optimization require estimates of body displacement per gait cycle; however, these estimates introduce error due to unincluded high order terms. In this paper, we formulate existing estimates for displacement, and describe the contribution of low order terms to these estimates. We additionally describe the magnitude of higher (third) order effects, and identify that choice of body coordinate, gait diameter, and starting phase influence these effects. We demonstrate that variation of such parameters on two example systems (the differential drive car and Purcell swimmer) effectively manages third order contributions. Capprin Bass, Suresh Ramasamy, Ross L. Hatton |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2022 | Optimal Gait Families using Lagrange Multiplier MethodabstractThe Robotic locomotion community is interested in optimal gaits for control. Based on the optimization criterion, however, there could be a number of possible optimal gaits. For example, the optimal gait for maximizing displacement with respect to cost is quite different from the maximum displacement optimal gait. Beyond these two general optimal gaits, we believe that the optimal gait should deal with various situations for high-resolution of motion planning, e.g., steering the robot or moving in “baby steps.” As the step size or steering ratio increases or decreases, the optimal gaits will slightly vary by the geometric relationship and they will form the families of gaits. In this paper, we explored the geometrical framework across these optimal gaits having different step sizes in the family via the Lagrange multiplier method. Based on the structure, we suggest an optimal locus generator that solves all related optimal gaits in the family instead of optimizing each gait respectively. By applying the optimal locus generator to two simplified swimmers in drag-dominated environments, we verify the behavior of the optimal locus generator. Jinwoo Choi 0008, Capprin Bass, Ross L. Hatton |
IROS | 2 |