Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tang Qian

dblp:314/6645 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Indexing and storage engines · 61% Information retrieval · 30% Query processing and optimization · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines
distributed indexing
0.912025
DIMS: Distributed Index for Similarity Search in Metric Spaces · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Indexing and storage engines
metric space indexing
0.912025
DIMS: Distributed Index for Similarity Search in Metric Spaces · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.912025
DIMS: Distributed Index for Similarity Search in Metric Spaces · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Query processing and optimization › query optimization
cost-based optimization
0.312025
DIMS: Distributed Index for Similarity Search in Metric Spaces · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

heterogeneous partitioning · 0.9filtering and validation · 0.9cost-based optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DIMS: Distributed Index for Similarity Search in Metric Spaces
abstract
Similarity search finds objects that are similar to a given query object based on a similarity metric. As the amount and variety of data continue to grow, similarity search in metric spaces has gained significant attention. Metric spaces can accommodate any type of data and support flexible distance metrics, making similarity search in metric spaces beneficial for many real-world applications, such as multimedia retrieval, personalized recommendation, trajectory analytics, data mining, decision planning, and distributed servers. However, existing studies mostly focus on indexing metric spaces on a single machine, which faces efficiency and scalability limitations with increasing data volume and query amount. Recent advancements in similarity search turn towards distributed methods, while they face challenges including inefficient local data management, unbalanced workload, and low concurrent search efficiency. To this end, we proposeDIMS, an efficientDistributedIndex for similarity search inMetricSpaces. First, we design a novel three-stage heterogeneous partition to achieve workload balance. Then, we present an effective three-stage indexing structure to efficiently manage objects. We also develop concurrent search methods with filtering and validation techniques that support efficient distributed similarity search. Additionally, we devise a cost-based optimization model to balance communication and computation cost. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DIMS significantly outperforms existing distributed similarity search approaches.
Yifan Zhu 0002, Chengyang Luo 0002, Tang Qian, Lu Chen 0001, Yunjun Gao, Baihua Zheng
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.3
2022 Spatio-Temporal Latent Graph Structure Learning for Traffic Forecasting
abstract
Accurate traffic forecasting, the foundation of intelligent transportation systems (ITS), has never been more significant than nowadays due to the prosperity of smart cities and urban computing. Recently, Graph Neural Network truly outperforms the traditional methods. Nevertheless, the most conventional GNN-based model works well while given a predefined graph structure. And the existing methods of defining the graph structures focus purely on spatial dependencies and ignore the temporal correlation. Besides, the semantics of the static pre-defined graph adjacency applied during the whole training progress is always incomplete, thus overlooking the latent topologies that may fine-tune the model. To tackle these challenges, we propose a new traffic forecasting framework-Spatio-Temporal Latent Graph Structure Learning networks (ST-LGSL). More specifically, the model employs a graph generator based on Multilayer perceptron and K-Nearest Neighbor, which learns the latent graph topological information from the entire data considering both spatial and temporal dynamics. Furthermore, with the initialization of MLP-kNN based on ground-truth adjacency matrix and similarity metric in kNN, ST-LGSL aggregates the topologies focusing on geography and node similarity. Additionally, the generated graphs act as the input of the Spatio-temporal prediction module combined with the Diffusion Graph Convolutions and Gated Temporal Convolutions Networks. Experimental results on two benchmarking datasets in real world demonstrate that ST-LGSL outperforms various types of state-of-art baselines.
Jiabin Tang, Tang Qian, Shijing Liu, Shengdong Du, Jie Hu 0007, Tianrui Li 0001
IJCNN2